you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Fuck off, /u/Trump_WG1WGA

[–]wristaction 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

This is all progressives have; to puff up and tell people to shut up and leave.

Where they have control, they censor. Where they don't have the authority to censor, you get pathetic displays of impotent anger from them like this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You assume I am progressive? Hell, no, I would never want progress. You can read my posts if you genuinely think my comment is related to what you note. I'm obiously annoyed with insanity of the OP's post. That's it. Is there a reasonable counter argument for that post - for the name calling - an accusations of rape? That is at the bottom of the Pyramid of Debate:

https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

Saidit wants the pyramid of debate, but doesn't do anything about those who contribute only items at the bottom of the pyramid. So how would I lift the discourse on the pyramid - with a refutation that notes mistakes and includes citations? For what? For the obvious disinformation that's here? You do realize that this OP's not true in the slightest. Still there are 29 chuckleheads who think it is "inciteful". Saidit rarely has anything inciteful or funny. Am I trying to censor /u/Trump_WG1WGA ? (No.) My response is at the same level of the pyramid of debate as OP's dumbass post. No one on Saidit will have any interest in what I have to say to /u/Trump_WG1WGA, except perhaps you. But your contribution is merely to assume that my response is that of a progressive and an attempt at censorship, both of which are are not necessarily true. The right-wing propaganda against Biden is merely to distract you and others from an honest discourse about politics. On Saidit it's working. This is why the site will remain small, full of Reddit rejects. Any attempt at the Pyramid of Debate often results in attacks from fragile users. There are some who are interested in debate, but not around much. But I digress....

[–]wendolynne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe if, instead of insightful or fun, we could rank items by the level of the pyramid they belong in. Perhaps then people would reach for higher levels. Or is it that posters confuse the words insight and incite?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Excellent idea. Top of the pyramid could be 'insightful' and bottom could be 'inciteful'. Somewhere in the middle could be: 'meh'. Perhaps if we could get the attention of /u/magnora7 for this...

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's an interesting idea. I feel like the voting button would be huge though because it'd have to have all the levels of the pyramid next to every post, but if that can be solved then it sounds very cool