all 30 comments

[–]madcow-5 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well, without even reading the article:

A few weeks out from the election he flat out stated during a town hall that he supports trans kids, giving eight as an example age. This was something less than five years ago you'd hear the occasional outrageous story of some hippy-dippy family in CA who's raising their kid as trans. Everyone agreed it's messed up, including people on the left, and it was thought of as only the fringe extreme. In less than five years we got a president who encourages it.

Similarly, drag queen story hour. Remember like two years ago it was all the rage? People wouldn't shut up about it. Then all of a sudden, they got real quiet. Because every single time it would turn out either the drag queen was a convicted sex offender trying to get access to children, or they'd do something wholly inappropriate like lay still on the floor and ask the children to crawl over their body, culminating in one of them straight up flashing his dick to the children, then claiming he "forgot" his panties that day.

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Even when arrangements are made to launder LGBT lunacy as normal, trannies step up to clarify: "No, we're unpleasant and insane".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaR-bH2hENM

In 2019, a group of moms in Tacoma attempted to protest a Drag Queen Story Hour event in their town. The authorities prepositioned three SWAT teams with snipers' nests to intimidate the moms.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/22/mom-protest-drag-queen-story-hour-sniper/

This isn't a passing fad among the fringe left. The system wants this. Why?

It is to demoralize and humiliate the population. To force us socially to repeat obvious lies so that we can't see ourselves as men and women with stable consciences. When the system knows you will say 2+2=5, it knows it can get you to, for example, rat out your mother or father for attending an illegal political demonstration.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

C'mon man!

[–]Poofter 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

A trumpy preaching about pedophiles while ignoring donny was BFFs with Jeffrey Epstein? Color me shocked

[–]wristaction 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The "BFF" who kicked him out of Mar A Lago back in 2002? Why did all of Epstein's political contributions go to Chuck Schumer, et al?

The witnesses in the Epstein case - the actual girls he trafficked - say you're full of shit. They did however directly implicate prominent Democratics Bill Richardson and George Mitchell.

In cases like this where people are discussing the unflattering and vile aspects of your gang, you have the option to just fuck off back to reddit where these things are aggressively censored for you. Doesn't it make you feel worse to chuck feeble copes which no one believes at it?

[–]Poofter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Donny is literally a pedophile and sex offender, yet here you are defending her 😐

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Aren't you afraid that by anathematizing pedophilia to make false claims about a former politician you're collaterally putting yourself at risk?

[–]Poofter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Politician? Hardly! At most, she’s known for hosting a game show. Other than that? Hardly heard about her!

[–]ukrdude10 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Meh, sexual crimes happen all across the spectrum, every political party, church, organization has pedophiles

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Why even make this bullshit response when there are organizations as a whole that we know from first hand accounts that hide it? Fuck that, not all fags are created equal. Fags are at the core of society's ills from historical, workplace, intellectual and hedonist circles everywhere they go, you let them fester they stink up the whole house.

[–]ukrdude10 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

We're talking about pedophilia here, not homosexuality. Gays and lesbians are harmless, pedophiles are monsters. They exist everywhere and can't be eliminated. The link between pedo and homo has been long debunked, you might as well believe in flat earth.

From my observation, societies that are tolerant of gays are prosperous and peaceful, while countries that are homophobic are usually poor and violent. Would you rather live in Denmark or Pakistan?

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

homosexuality is learnt, not inate.

Pedophiles create them....

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

are you in a learning mood? come sit over here...

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

... because drag queen story time is aboot to start

[–]ukrdude10 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, tell that to me who has never been sexually abused and still 100% gay. Or males who have been molested by men, and became totally straight. When did choose to be aroused by women and not men?

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

bOtHsIdEs

Nuh-uh. Public school teachers are saints who deserve a raise. Sure they already make 150% of the median salary, but sometimes they have to pay for motel rooms and abortions out of their own pockets.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22district+employee%22+minor&atb=v230-1&ia=web

https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22district+employee%22+minor

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with progressives is that they only need a person in a white lab coat peddling research that argues that children are as capable of choosing "intimacy" as they are of choosing gender to go full-on pro-pedophilia. The day is coming when the public school district employee who's been grooming your child can get your custodial rights terminated for "pedophobia".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Fuck off, /u/Trump_WG1WGA

[–]wristaction 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

This is all progressives have; to puff up and tell people to shut up and leave.

Where they have control, they censor. Where they don't have the authority to censor, you get pathetic displays of impotent anger from them like this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You assume I am progressive? Hell, no, I would never want progress. You can read my posts if you genuinely think my comment is related to what you note. I'm obiously annoyed with insanity of the OP's post. That's it. Is there a reasonable counter argument for that post - for the name calling - an accusations of rape? That is at the bottom of the Pyramid of Debate:

https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

Saidit wants the pyramid of debate, but doesn't do anything about those who contribute only items at the bottom of the pyramid. So how would I lift the discourse on the pyramid - with a refutation that notes mistakes and includes citations? For what? For the obvious disinformation that's here? You do realize that this OP's not true in the slightest. Still there are 29 chuckleheads who think it is "inciteful". Saidit rarely has anything inciteful or funny. Am I trying to censor /u/Trump_WG1WGA ? (No.) My response is at the same level of the pyramid of debate as OP's dumbass post. No one on Saidit will have any interest in what I have to say to /u/Trump_WG1WGA, except perhaps you. But your contribution is merely to assume that my response is that of a progressive and an attempt at censorship, both of which are are not necessarily true. The right-wing propaganda against Biden is merely to distract you and others from an honest discourse about politics. On Saidit it's working. This is why the site will remain small, full of Reddit rejects. Any attempt at the Pyramid of Debate often results in attacks from fragile users. There are some who are interested in debate, but not around much. But I digress....

[–]wendolynne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe if, instead of insightful or fun, we could rank items by the level of the pyramid they belong in. Perhaps then people would reach for higher levels. Or is it that posters confuse the words insight and incite?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Excellent idea. Top of the pyramid could be 'insightful' and bottom could be 'inciteful'. Somewhere in the middle could be: 'meh'. Perhaps if we could get the attention of /u/magnora7 for this...

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's an interesting idea. I feel like the voting button would be huge though because it'd have to have all the levels of the pyramid next to every post, but if that can be solved then it sounds very cool

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ad hom

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've seen the videos of Biden being touchy feely in a way that comes across as creepy, but it's more than a little bit of a reach to call that sexual abuse.

By that same token, you could make just as strong of an argument that supporting Trump means you support sexual abuse and pedophilia. The guy has made creepy comments about his daughter, and there are some photos where he's holding/touching her as a kid in ways that similarly come across as mildly disturbing.

And if there are photos of his son sexually abusing a 14-year-old, then his son should go to prison. But they didn't vote for his son. They voted for Joe Biden.

Why do the huge glaring flaws in this guy's logic even need to be pointed out to you guys? It should be obvious to even a casual reader, so who the fuck is upvoting this shit? Also, why the fuck is this in the news sub? Literally nothing here is new information, and it's just some dipshit's retarded opinion.

[–]LaurynHill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i support free moneyyyyy<3