you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

seconded, there's tons of legit studies showing that non-ionizing radiation alters/impacts numerous biological processes. for reasons, these impacts are not considered "harmful" just quite yet. Scientists are forming advocacy groups to address this head on. the current EMF exposure guidelines are half baked and mostly from the 70s.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ancient EMF exposure standards are only using heat as a cause for harm.
They model the complex biochemical human body as a barrel of water.
And then many scientists use this barrel to explain why the radiation can do no harm.

That is why it is very important for new safety standards to base new models on the video above. Or on the CIA research.

From the CIA research you can see how little radiation is needed to cause permanent harm to cells.