all 18 comments

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No more innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

How is it a plot? The dude publicly behaved like a nonce for decades

His name is in Epstein's little book

He was friends with Jimmy Saville

He's a rapist

It's not a plot

[–]turtlew0rk 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

The dude publicly behaved like a nonce for decades

How so? Why are we only now seeing him called a rapist?

His name is in Epstein's little book

Nope.

He was friends with Jimmy Saville

What are you basing this on?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In May 2007, Brand called Jimmy Savile, who suggested the pair could meet if Brand brought along a sister. Brand doesn’t have a sister, so instead offered to bring a female employee — agreeing, on Savile’s request, that she should be naked. “I’ve got a personal assistant,” he said. “And part of her job description is that anyone I demand she greet, meet, massages, she has to do it. She’s very attractive, Jimmy.” This was four years before Savile’s death and five years before details of the Jim’ll Fix It presenter’s crimes were exposed.

https://archive.ph/mP8ff

[–]turtlew0rk 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Brand called Jimmy Savile

You mean Brand interviewed him on BBC radio?

Jimmy Savile, who suggested the pair could meet if Brand brought along a sister.

Did you listen to this? Brand says "It would be very nice to meet you one day" (as in they hadn't met and were not friends) to which Saville made the comment about bringing his sister which Brand replied (clearly joking) that he could bring an employee.

As you stated this was 5 years before Saville's crimes were exposed. If interviewing the man once and making a joke that is tasteless in hindsight makes him friends with Saville and by extension a rapist then what are we to think of the Royal family the British government and BBC who supported him for 6 decades including Margaret Thatcher who entertained him at her home and called for him to be knighted?

Prince Charles was close to him and sought his public relations advice. Princess Diana was just a phone call away. And former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher entertained him at her country home and pushed for him to be knighted.

Jimmy Savile was a staple as a presenter for the BBC, on radio and TV for decades, from the 1970s to the turn of the millennium. But all along, he had been a serial sex abuser and pedophile — which came to light publicly after his 2011 death.

Source

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why did they wait until now to accuse him?

[–]DirewolfGhost 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Because sin is supported by evil only until repentance.

[–]turtlew0rk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

HUH???

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Need to double check the Epstein connection because I don't see Russel under B in the black book.

But he definitely partied with elite child sex procurer Jimmy Saville

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope. He interviewed him.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're such a good goy.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why lie?

[–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No one should be denied participation in commerce or public engagement from an accusation. That said, given this guy's history, I expect he'll get a guilty verdict. Perverts do perverted things. It's like drug use: they have to keep getting more extreme for the same sexual high.

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Verdict? There are no charges let alone a trial. The goal here is not to convict him in court it is to convict him in the court of public opinion which they were easily able to accomplish with only headlines.

What history exactly are you referring to? His past addictions which he has always been quite vocal about and until now wasn't considered a rapist or a pervert.

[–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If that's the case, once again, fuck the media: the enemy of the people.

[–]turtlew0rk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is all coming from "anonymous" sources. So it all comes down to a reporters word of what a secret person told them happened 20 years ago.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Has he even been charged?

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Of course not.