all 5 comments

[–]Mikulbleu 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good, lets have less crooked mobsters trying to run for election

[–]One_Jack_Move 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, cut back on the number of corrupt a-holes.

[–]jamesK_3rd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm actually ok with this.

Then I can follow this guy or San Fran Nancy, and trade what they're trading.

When they ban it, well then it just moves to shell corporations, PACs, and/or non profits that "fundraise" on behalf of a candidate.

They aren't doing anything to actually stop it, they're just making it less obvious to average people.

Of course, that's probably why there will be bi-partisan support for "banning" it

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was a Twitter account that posted all the details of Congress' stock trading, what they were buying and when.

Twitter swiftly banned it, of course. Because they're pro-regime propagandists.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blatant crook. Just blatant.