all 12 comments

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nice post. Hit the nail right on the head. These globe-conquerors ruin millions of lives for personal profit, and so many unknowingly (and knowingly) enable it. Thanks to the information age we live in, we're becoming very aware of how the wool was pulled over our eyes when it came to things like 9/11 and Iraq.

[–]Jesus[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks, I'm reading some great books on the neoconservatives and their origins and ideologies. They sprouted from Trotskyism and the secular Jewish movement in NY where Trotsky lived and later left for Russia with NY bankers money in hand to initiate the Bolshevik revolution. They have an anti-stalinist view (probably because a Stalinist KGB agent, killed Trotsky in Mexico City as well as Stalins paranoia that the old Bolsheviks would try to kill him, so he conducted the red purge, killing mostly ethnic Jews, not because he hated Jews but because they were the old bolsheviks) with collectivist philosophies on the welfare state but they are ALWAYS shapeshifting and lying, so you certainly have to take their inteligentsia with a grain of salt. I don't even like to use the word neoconservative because they are neither conservatives nor are they new. These criminals have infiltrated the conservative movement as well as the evangelists in order to trump up support for war. They use these groups as scapegoats and have tricked them into supporting wars for The Greater Israel Project. Entirely neocon sponsored propaganda. If the neocns were ideologues of Christianity, then it might make sense but the neocons are mostly secular and atheistic, so it's all based on deciet.

What is interesting is that many of these neocons are pro-Israel but not particularly Zionist, at least the older neocon movement when they didn't particularly have a foreign policy ideology (They're probably lying though). They, like Strauss, a founding member of the neoconservative movement thought Zionism was a double edged sword. It's also interesting because the bolsheviks and trotskyites were against the Russian Zionists and executed many. They felt that Jews in the diaspora should assimilate and that Zionism slowed down the comintern.

EDIT: Bill Kristol HATES Trump. Kristol is a warcriminal. I don't particularly like Trump but I've always wondered why many Bush neocons hate Trump. One reason could be that it's a propaganda tactic. The neocons during Bush's presidency were on Fox News 24/7 pushing for war. NOW, they're on MSNBC and CNN calling out Trump, which leads me to believe that they find it necessary enough to bash Trump because he already has a bad reputation, and most people forget about, let alone know anything about the neocons, so it's a win for them. However, Neocons are STILL surrounding Trump, he appointed them! So, I think it's all deception. Maybe the neocons are on CNN, MSNBC to trump up war and get the so called leftists to support a war. Maybe the war with Iran, if it ever does occur will happen during a democrat presidency, hence why the neocons are being interviewed on these news outlets.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, the information has enlightened many people to the truth, that's why they have deployed propaganda, social engineering and censorship to new levels.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

What is the deal with you people and your 10,000 word posts? You make good points, but for fucks sake teach yourself how to write persuasively. It's exhausting to try to read through all of this. Break it up into pieces.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

How about you just read it, and stop complaining. It's not that long. I'm pretty sure you posted the very same comment on another one of my posts awhile back.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)


Learn to write, take some online courses. Nobody is going to read your 10,000 word post. Break it up. Learn about persuasion. Get busy, because you're wasting your time with long-windedness.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You'e just lazy and won't read it. That's fine, have you ever read a book before? It would take 5 minutes out of your day to read it. And you were the same one who posted the very same comment on another one of my posts because it was too long for you to read.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So what should I take out then? The part about the New Pearl Harbor? Maybe the part about the Transformative event?

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not Chipit, and he was being kinda rude, but you could just cut it in to pieces each with a smaller focus. I have the same problem when I write, I just want to write an entire book chapter and it all comes out in one long piece. I've found that if you can put forward an 8-paragraph piece, it gets better reception than one that's 30+ paragraphs. Plus it makes for more focused conversations in the comments below the piece.

That said, I have no problem with your long pieces, they're very high quality. But if your goal is maximum readership, publishing in 6 to 8 paragraph chunks might work for you the best.

For instance, I've put out about 200 articles over the years probably. If you look at the ones that did best here:

Looking at the self-posts, you can see they're all about a similar length. 5-8 paragraphs, with many paragraphs being quite short, maybe just a sentence or two. I think this is the maximum effective length for a "long form" post, in my experience. So you could break this OP post in to 3 posts in some word document, then each day publish just 1 part. You'd probably get way more readership, your ideas would have a wider audience, and it would take not much more work on your part.

Anyway, just some ideas about writing tactics. I like your writing a lot though, you could change nothing and I'd still be happy, personally. :)

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe I'll do parts in different posts.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cheers. Just trying to help, from one writer to another.