"In defense of the world Order, U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die. ... We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money."
-- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Back to the Womb, July/August 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs
“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”
-- Julius Caesar
“Today, Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true, if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond – whether real or promulgated – that threatened our very existence. It is then that all the peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished with the guarantee of their well-being, granted to them by their world government.”
-- Henry Kissinger, at the Bilderberg Conference in Evians, France, 1991
The So-called NEOCONS
In order to create an internationalist framework you need an institutional framework of people across the globe, people in power with wealth able to wield the global economic system in their localities on behalf of a internationalist government. To be clear, the Rockefeller family are notorious for and admit to calling for a new economic world order. An order that will emergence from a strong BRIC alliance. This multilateral economic world order was conceived back in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, specifically in the Think Tank book, 'Prospects for America.' It is markedly similar to the ideology of duginism.
Presently, this vision has thus far been materialized in the G20+, where it was before just the G7 operating the global agenda, moving from unipolar economic control from a USD global currency reserve to an all inclusive SDR base; thus a multipolar, dedolarized, economic order with the inclusion of other nations, most particularly developing BRIC nations, ie China, India, Brazil, Russia, Iran, etc.
The American plutocracy has been very complicit but they too wish to reap as much as possible while still having a chair of immense power in a USD global currency reserve so they've delayed IMF reforms and thus, the bypass is already underway with the BRICS development bank, an IMF counterpart that will distribute SDRs.
However, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements, as well as the majority of BRIC countries are becoming tired of U.S nonconservative imperialism, mostly advocated by dual-Israeli Zionists, a large majority of them Jewish. In fact the entire Iraq war and the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyst: the WTC bombings were primarily conceived by 25 neoconservatives, the majority of them Jewish, enthusiastically admitted in an Israeli news report. The movement originated from Irwin Kristol, a communist and trotskyite with anti-Stalinist views.
Many of these government officials are reported to have held dual Israeli-US citizenship¥ during their tenure in Washington, DC. Included in the signatories of the Project for a New American Century is Dick Cheny, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz¥, Peter Rodman, Elliott Abrams¥, Richard Armitage, Robert Zoellick¥, Paula Dobriansky, Richard Perle¥, Eliot A. Cohen¥, Douglas Feith¥, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby¥, Dov Zakheim¥, John Bolten¥, David Wurmser¥, Michael Chertoff¥, Phillip Zellikow¥, Jeb Bush, etc.
Here are some excerpts from their think tank documents:
“...show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests.”
Of course we remember George H.W Bush calling for a New World Order and the establishment of a "truly United Nations" as authored by the UN's founders. This speech occurred on September 11th 1990, 11 years before September 11th 2001. But Bush and especially his son would be key in shaping the circumstances needed to curtail established American principles and proceed in redirecting US foreign policy.
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
As evidenced from that statement, this was an essential key, critical point that was clearly not lost on this think tank group (Project for a New American Century).
So, extreme doubt was cast as to how fast these aims could be achieved, even under a right-wing administration.
They needed a powerful catalyst that would force Congress and the US public to go along with their treasonous plan for alleged US imperialism and dominance. (More on the "alleged" aspect as you read onward.)
By their own numerous admissions, they needed a new Pearl Harbor.
The UN and its Coinciding Geopolitics
We all know the International Masters of Finance are pulling the strings on this never ending war. My question: WHO or WHAT pulls their strings?
Here we have, in 1998, the V.P. of UNOCAL urging the U.S. Congress to help the United Nations establish an internationally recognized government in Afghanistan so they can lay their oil pipeline. That was nearly four years ago before 2001.
"The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges."
"... we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company. "
"A recent study for the World Bank states that the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable netbacks to oil producers... " [i.e., higher profits for the banksters]
"... cannot begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan government is in place."
"We urge the Administration and the Congress to give strong support to the United Nations-led peace process in Afghanistan."
Source: Read U.S. House of Representatives; 107th Congress, 1st Session; 1998: Testimony By: John J. Maresca; Vice President, International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation To House Committee On International Relations, Subcommittee On Asia And The Pacific February 12, 1998 Washington, D.C.
In it, they covertly called for a war in Afghanistan in order to install a new puppet-leader; create a puppet government that will not impede their plan to glut the area of its vast natural resources... but HOW to start that war? How about terror in the U.S.?
But even if both pipelines were built, they would not have enough total capacity to transport all the oil expected to flow from the region in the future; nor would they have the capability to move it to the right markets. Other export pipelines must be built. This is just one geopolitical agenda of many which has blossomed from the pretext that is 9/11.
The 1992 NEOCON Think Tank DPG Documents
Now for the 1992 DPG neoconservative plan, which called for:
Huge increase in US defense spending.
Assertion of US lone superpower status.
Discourage industrial nations from challenging the US.
Maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors
Prevent emergence of regional competitors and new rivals.
Adopt the use of preemptive force - unprovoked warfare.
US should forsake multilateralism and act independently to get its own way.
Ability to handle two major regional contingencies at once. (SW Asia & Korea)
Foreign intervention in global disputes, even if not directly related to US interests.
Make Milstar (Military Strategic and Tactical Relay) satellite communications network top priority.
Show the leadership necessary to establish and protect "a new order."
The 1994 New Citizenship Project
In 1994, a new non-profit organization, the 'New Citizenship Project' was formed, with political commentator William (Bill) Kristol as chairman and Gary J. Schmitt as president. It was largely funded by many private neoconservative donors and right-wing foundations as well as democrat war-hawks. Their mission statement...
"An organization created to promote greater civic participation in our national life."
1996 and Neocon Treachery
When it comes to neocon treachery, 1996 was indeed a very big year, because these same neoconservatives decided to get busy. Very busy.
They formed the US Committee to Expand NATO, which later became the US Committee on NATO.)
Neoconservatives Bill Kristol and Donald Kagan co-authored a piece called "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy," another cornerstone in their plan for complete control of US policy.
Also in 1996, another dark document was conceived and written for the IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (Israeli company), with dire implications for the middle east. It was entitled "A Clean Break - A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," penned by neocon co-authors David Wurmser and Richard Perle. It formed the basis for the middle east wars which would take place post-9/11.
Most have given credit to Douglas Feith, but he now denies being a "main" contributor, although admits to be consulted on the paper before its publication.
1997 and The Project for a New American Century
In 1997, the Project for a New American Century was finally born, the PNAC. Spawned from the skewed right-wing brain-trust of neocons who are really fascist neotrotskyites; William Kristol and Robert Kagan, their sole purpose was to form a new US policy... one that was overly aggressive and self aggrandizing, espousing the US as supreme over all. (In reality, the "supreme US" is all a ruse, which will be explained further on.)
In its founding statement of principles, just like the DPG draft, the PNAC statement called for U.S. global leadership and preemptive action, stating:
"Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership."
The evidence of a clear effort to take down the US becomes even more transparent just a year later in October of '98, when yet another dark document was conceived, called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy."
1998, Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy
"Catastrophic Terrorism"... as a National Policy?
Well, that's exactly what the public and other government watchdogs were asking back then as well, and so guess what? All of a sudden - magically, overnight - that document suddenly had a new name... Catastrophic Terrorism: "Tackling the New Danger."
So, using our 20/20 hindsight once again, was that earlier title all just some form of eerie prescience, or was it an actual revealing preview of their true intended plans for this country?
Thinking minds shouldn't have to parse that one about for too long.
Then there was the issue of the little subtitle in the document...
"Imagining the 'transformative event.'"
There are two key components to that title... the act of "imagining," as well as the "transformative event," the latter of which is actually two more things unto itself - something "transformative," and in the form of an "event."
Perhaps the only title more telling about its authors might have been "Daydreaming about the transformative event."
A very telling admission/concession of guilt came in the form of a later revision which shamelessly changed the subtitle to its present version, "Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century."
Although, even that small revision reveals much about this group and its plans, because it blatantly spells out in its revised title, a new type of US governance is being implied.
A Policy Coup
This new policy proposal was the byproduct of yet another tiny micro-group of neoconservative men; Zionist gentile, Ashton B. Carter; Russian Zionist Jew, John Deutch, and Philip Zellikow, Jewish Zionist. At the time, only John Deutch was publicly well known as the former Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994-95, and Director of the CIA from 1995-96. Deutch also served on the boards of directors of Citigroup, Cummins, Raytheon, and Schlumberger Ltd. Deutch is also a member of the Trilateral Commission.
Let us see what the Jewish press says themselves about Zionists / Jews with Dual-Israeli citizenship occupying the U.S. Government.
From Jewish Week, July 21, 1995:
JEWISH APPOINTEES AT WHITE HOUSE [headline] An administration that already seems to be setting records for the number of Jews in high-level positions has added several more.
Lee Fisher, the former attorney general of Ohio, is President Clinton's choice as head of the National Commission on Crime Control and Prevention... [the article tells us that Fisher is: a Cleveland lawyer, played a major role in setting up hate crimes statues in Ohio; known for his effort to create partnerships between law enforcement and citizens groups; leading advocate of handgun control]
... Cheryl Halpern, to the broadcasting board of governors of the International Bureau of Broadcasting. [Halpern: was president of the Natl. Jewish Coalition; served on the executive board of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, [couldn't that be considered a conflict of interest?]the Executive Committee of the N. J. Regional Advisory Board of the A.D.L. and the Metrowest Jewish Federation] Gentiles did not scream HATE CRIMES or Discrimination! Only "special persons" do that.
The Jewish Forward '95 carried an article about Jew, John Deutch's appointment as head of CIA.
As soon as he was confirmed, Deutch promptly dismissed all experienced high-ranking gentile CIA officials and replaced them with a new, all-Jewish staff: George Tenet, to CIA Deputy Director; David Cohen to Dir. Of Operations and Nora Slatkin to Executive Director... third in command of the Agency.
The Forward says that Deutch and his family are holocaust survivors. His mother was the daughter of the famous Zionist, Jean Fischer, whose family were wealthy diamond merchants in Belgium. This fact connects the wealthy Deutch family both to the Zionist state of Israel and to the international Jewish diamond and banking cartel, which has a long history of fraud and third world exploitation
In February 2000, CBS-60 Minutes, aired a program about a former employee (a Jew) who was suing the CIA, alleging that he had been terminated from the CIA – singled out -- because he was a Jew. This was a common occurrence in the 40's through 60's but not too common in the present day. As a result of that pernicious performance, the ADL has now become an arm of the U.S. Government – a "watch dog" appointed to "observe and direct" the hiring/firing policies of (allegedly) OUR U.S. CIA!
Do you understand just how far the infiltration and control of OUR government has gone and is there ANY doubt that what is in place now is a Zionist Occupied Government,. Look at congress and their applaud when Benjamin Netanyahu speaks. It is a circus. And yet saying this will get you the anti-Semitic canard.
Also from Peter Kawaja's "THE SADDEST CHAPTER OF AMERICAS HISTORY" on John Deutch, a "special person" who like Bush, took control of "our," already corrupt CIA :
John Deutch now CIA Director - formerly Chemistry Professor at MIT & on the Defense Science Board which issued a secret report in 1980 urging US production of "binary" weapons.
The New York Times reported in July 1995 that on his appointment, Deutch "moved quickly to change things, Frederick Hitz [Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency] was the only senior official who kept his job." He essentially gutted the CIA of so called realist conservatives.
Furthermore, Phillip Zellikow would "coincidentally" be later named as the head of the 9/11 Commission, while Ashton B. Carter would later become Secretary of Defense.
Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy Continued...
The thing most damning about the Catastrophic Terrorism (CT) study was their joint speculation on what would have happened had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing brought down the twin towers...
"Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."
The proposal then suggests:
"More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks."
These members of the CT study also wrote:
"Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible."
"Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a before and after."
"Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities."
This isn't a proposal as much as it is a full out plan... neocon daydreaming on how to take down the United States.
When it comes to the numerous repeated references to "Pearl Harbor," it was all very deliberate. It was literally an elaborate mass conditioning scheme, to get people to once again accept the "great lie," as they did leading to WWII.
As coincidence would have it... conspicuously enough, the $450-million dollar movie blockbuster "Pearl Harbor" was also released early that year, in May of 2001, settling the horror of Dec 7, 1941 back into the public consciousness.
Add to that, this disturbing account. According to author Barbara Honegger, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had given out literally hundreds of copies of Pearl Harbor; Warning and Decision that year, written by Rand employee Roberta Wohlstetter. It was also reported to be required reading for Rumsfeld's personal aides.
With a multi-trillion dollar War on Terror looming on the horizon, this was not a coincidence.
The PNAC set the stage and then they played it for all its worth. This group was literally the poster-child for all things non-Constitutional mayhem post 9/11, most especially the run-up to the Iraq War.
Preceding the war, key PNAC members such as Paul Wolfowitz (later the head of the World Bank!!!) and Richard Perle beat the drum for war with Iraq as did Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel hard-line Likud party members. According the Vanderbilt Television Archives, Wolfowitz was on 180 times to sell the war while Perle was on 187.
They were programming the American public to not only accept their ruse, but then act upon it using classical conditioning methods.
And as history shows, it seems to have worked pretty damn well.
Each of these PNAC proposals were essential pieces to the overall master plan, the takeover and dissolution of the United States, the latter of which is totally contrary to their stated principles, but as many have already figured out, the inevitable outcome of this has already been deviously engineered into the deployment of their aggressive plan, in the form of blowback and retaliation from those oppressed and infuriated by the plans eventual overall execution.
Perhaps most telling of all, the PNAC website
(www.NewAmericanCentury.org) and the POTD website (www.PTdemocracy.org) have both been removed from the internet.
What's the old saying about having nothing to hide?
Long story short folks, if you haven't figured it out by now, this was an illegal coup on the United States of America. Period. End of discussion.
According to Michelle Ciarrocca and William D. Hartung's book, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival," World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002...
"When Zakheim left the Defense Department in 1987, it was for an executive vice president post with the Virginia-based government contractor Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), which has supplied the Defense Department with military technology such as remote controlled flight technology for several decades and has been a support contractor for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Zakheim also served as CEO at subsidiary SPC International and as a consultant for the defense contractors McDonnell Douglas (now a part of Boeing) and Northrop Grumman."
When it comes to the US neoconservative movement, there appears to be dirt from 9/11, no matter where you turn, yet, this is but only the tip of the iceberg.
Everyone gets the blame post 9/11, except for the neocons, Zionists and their US and Israeli supporters who planned it all. For added measure, these neocons were center stage on the spotlight of leftist and right leaning news agencies. They are paraded on live television as if they are saviors or idols we should look up to.
The fact that the mainstream corporate media has said virtually nothing about this infiltration of the US government by a private neoconservative group of individuals, with foreign ties to another government, that is quite telling in itself.
It tends to substantiate and corroborate allegations that the media is a disinformation and propaganda conduit of the government, supported by the ultra-wealthy powers that be.
Another point of contention is the fact that this secretive group is also a key sister organization to another covert group, the Israeli organization known as IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. (Responsible for Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.)
The two plans together, Rebuilding America's Defenses, and A Clean Break, both dovetail together as one plan, with a singular agenda and objective.
One could rightfully suggest that there may be more than just these two uncovered plans in play. There very well could conceivably be at least two more plans, covering both the EU and Asia, but they have yet to surface in the public domain.
I've said it many times over and I will keep repeating it every chance I get...
The Taliban did not create the IASPS or the PNAC.
Al Qaeda didn't draft the "Clean Break" document, nor the 1992 DPG, or the 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document.
Isis is not the one changing US law or restricting your Constitutional rights.
Our politicians did all of this to you... to all of us... and yet they themselves are but minions to the powers that be (TPTB), puppets to the uber-rich marionettes who rule this world with indifference for all but themselves.
Allegedly... these neoconservative Israel hard-liner idealists did it all so that they could perpetuate their plan for US supremacy through the "New American Century," but in all reality, it's about the demise of the US, for a one-world globalist rule.
That may be hard to accept, or even fathom for some, but one only needs to look at what's happened to the US post 9/11 as a result of their covert national policy changes.
This is why many of the internationalists see fit to turn to a multilateral economic order with the possible exclusion of the U.S.
The system at its present has been in development for more then three centuries now, its formations can be seen in action in the late 1600s in Amsterdam which was a former financial power house in the past which aided in the removal of the Roman Catholic's influence in England(King James) with William of Orange, (ref. The Glorious Revolution).
Many people hate on the world government for their engineering of economies and people, but what these people have done has been a natural state of progression towards a stable, economically egalitarian redistribution whose aim is a better quality of life for people, a state counter intuitive to the human animal because tribal feudalism is that state and its manifestations occur in things such as Financial Faux-Capitalism, where we have a short rebuff too, as to why we have democratic socialism with the plugin for capitalist markets. The New Economic World Order might look good on paper, it might even work, yet we've seen for many years its infiltration and the bad people that surround it. It could be hailed as the savior of poverty and war, the antidote in fact, or just another form of totalitarian control.