all 26 comments

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

From the "Peace Prize" to the "Eternal Peace Prize".

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)


[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Hé, HE KILLED Bin Laden yeah...personally

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Bin Laden died of renal failure in 2001.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)


NOO it was "Super Obama" 🐱‍🏍🐱‍🚀🐱‍👤

[–]thecrazygamer16 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

how nice is the site saidit

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very nice, we just don't censor willy nilly liek reddit or voat. As long as you follow the pyramid of debate to some extent.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Here're some "Super Obama" factoids. (Obviously, they're not as serious as the extrajudicial assassinations, but...)

Found at: (

Bombshell: The Real Reason Barack Obama And Michele Lost Their Law License. BY David Herold


I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn't know why until I read this.

This is 100% legit. I check it out at ( Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois ; and they are very strict. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.

Big surprise.

Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

Consider this:

  1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!

  1. Facts.Source: (

  2. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago .

  3. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

  4. "He did not hold the title of Professor of Law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

Source: ( ;


[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

OHH FACK, this is the conspiracy sub, diddent notice that when i was reacting to guys are really crazy imo, its good to have a open view and not to trust all, but to say like USA is responable for 9-11 and stuff REALLY 🥴😵 thats insane and , and were do those speculations end, NO-WHERE end NEVER, because you can say wat you want. scare who yeh want and just fantasize alll you want without any prove or facts.... like Mell Gibson...or religions

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These aren't my claims, but the links (the ones that work) do contain supporting evidence.

Since you brought it up; here is a top 10 list of suspicious facts about 9/11.

These facts are barely scratching the surface.

The official story is absurd. Many questions still need to be answered.

The victims of the 9/11 attack deserve a proper investigation.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, The US elections will eventually come so I think we should know more about the possible candidates of both sides and how dirty they really are.

A week after Obama was awarded with the noble peace prize, a missile strike slammed one of the poorest tribes in Yemen and a lot of civilians were killed.

[–]Horrux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tulsi Gabbard.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Vote: None of thee above.

[–]Horrux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Also, Yemen was clearly nuked, which begs the question, WHOSE nuke was it? Saudi Arabia supposedly doesn't have them, so... WHOSE?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

israel, tho i bet saudi does have nukes too but they need israel's permission to use them

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So you saw the video of the bomb?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)


[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Well yeah, look:

There was a better video of that (or another similar) explosion that showed the radiation effect on the camera much better.

But yeah, nukes in Yemen of all places. I mean, those people have nothing, so let's nuke them. Because.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

But it looks like a Fuel air bomb.
Very nasty.
Atomic bomb explodes much faster than speed of air.
Neutron bomb does not even cause explosion, just radiation.

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I never said it was a neutron bomb. You clearly know very little about the topic, since you don't recognize the obvious nuclear aspect of this explosion. This is definitely not a fuel air bomb.

Also, if you think you know how all the CURRENT designs of nukes detonate and what they look like, it means you are the world's dumbest spy, you know all the deepest secrets of all the nuclear powers on Earth and you talk from the point of view of that ultra-classified knowledge.

No, you just don't know what you are talking about and are thinking about nukes from the 1950s. Take it from somebody who CAN recognize a nuclear explosion. That's a nuke. Look for other videos, there's at least one that gives a better view. Do some research, don't take my word for it.

[–]Zizzle 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You don't know what a nuclear explosion looks like. Nukes are a cold war scare tactic and might not be as real as you think.

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I do. There are unmistakable telltales of a nuke that cannot be reproduced otherwise.

But please explain your nuclear denial. I'm sure we'll have a good laugh. Let me guess, you think the Earth is flat, too?

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You clearly know very little about the topic..

Personal attacks are not allowed on this forum.

Anyway. I disagree with all your points.
It was a JDAM Bomb:

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL so you are posting a video of a jdam bomb that is utterly, completely and infinitely different from what I am talking about. That's only proof that you are posting completely unrelated things.

Well done. And it wasn't a personal attack, it was a simple statement of fact. Not everyone knows a lot about nukes, and the "info" about the 1960s style of nukes are not valid anymore. There has been huge advancement since then.

Still not a nuke?

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, it is utterly false to assert that a neutron bomb does not explode. It does, and usually has at least a 10-15kt yield, which is a pretty big boom.

The difference is that the tamper is different and neutron-transparent, and secondary fusion material, which is absent.

So it's a small nuke with lots of neutrons, but it does go BOOOOM.