all 32 comments

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

Your timeline doesn't make sense.

Jan 2015 - Snowden leaks prove China hacked the F35 program [1]

Sep 2015 - nine months after the Der Spiegel article linked there, AVIC buy 51% and BHR buy 49% of Henniges [2]

It's physically and temporally impossible that the acquisition led to the hack.

Didn't you spot the timeline issue? Why didn't you notice the hole in your timeline? Or you just didn't care?

1 - https://thediplomat.com/2015/01/new-snowden-documents-reveal-chinese-behind-f-35-hack/

2 - https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/

None of your links demonstrate any of these things, which would be necessary to back up the point you're trying to make.

  1. That Henniges actually contributed materially to the F35 program, or have any ongoing relevance to the progra.

  2. That their anti-vibration tech was actually used by China in any way

  3. That the anti-vibration tech is classified or in any way secret (it's not in any science journals? There's no wikipedia page about how anti-vibration works?)

  4. That the US government who already review MIC sales to foreign companies thought this was wrong, or had any concerns.

I mean - let's take the thousand mile view, and look at what you have actually proven.

You proved that a businessman involved with business deals, was involved in a deal that saw an aerospace company acquired.

That's all you have proven. It's not even an interesting story at this stage. Come back when you have something real

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

It's physically and temporally impossible that the acquisition led to the hack.

No one said it did. The copy paste from the article was only saying what was happening at the same time period and did not say in any way they were caused by one another.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Your title quite literally implies a causal connection between the existence of the Chinese jet, and Hunter Biden's business deals.

So, now we've clarified the hack issue was unrelated and you have edited your post; can you please succinctly lay out your accusation?

I think this is the point of your post:

A businessman was involved in an aerospace buyout

There's no meat to any of your waffle, beyond that.

You have shown how one aerospace company purchased another company.

You did not show any link to any Chinese jet, you did not show that this buyout was bad for American security or secrecy, and you did not show any foul play.

Yawn. Come back when you have a real story to tell. This is crap work.

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

So, now we've clarified the hack issue was unrelated and you have edited your post;

It's not my fault you can't read. The ONLY edit I made was the "addition".

Please stop trying to justify Hunter Biden giving aid to the Chinese military. That is text book treason no matter how you spin it.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Please stop trying to justify Hunter Biden giving aid to the Chinese military. That is text book treason no matter how you spin it.

What aid? You haven't laid out any such thing.

Seriously, where does it say, in any of your post, that he gave aid?

I asked you quite clearly, to actually lay out your allegation.

It's bad faith of you, to now start inserting a new allegation: that Hunter gave aid to the Chinese military.

What aid? How?

Don't be so bad faith and don't insert new allegations. Just lay out what you're actually accusing here. It just seems to me 'businessman does a business deal'.

  • how is this in any way linked to any particular Chinese jet?

  • is the anti vibration tech, even a secret?

  • was any foul play involved? Where are you alleging foul play? Your OP doesn't actually allege any.

Are you going to actually get to grips with this story you posted, or do you just engage with it as a fun narrative? Does it even bother you that, none of what you're writing lines up with the real world? Do you just experience this as a fun internet game, or are you trying to claim something in the real world happened

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

You obviously have a bias agenda and just fain a lack of reading comprehension. Your tiny Chinese penis must give you so much mental anguish, that a penis like mine, considered small in America, seems so huge in comparison. .

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Sure, help me out, then.

Please help me. Because you wrote this

If you want to know more details about how he is connected to the advancement of the j-31 and how the purchase helped China slip past existing sanctions I left plenty of links that go into the subjects in detail

Which of your links should I click for the "detail" you promised about the J-31?

Please help me for I am not smart like you

  • how the purchase helped China slip past existing sanctions

  • how he is connected to the advancement of the j-31

You promised me the details, so where are they?

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The answer to your 2 questions are in 2 of the links I don't have time to look right now but will find the correct link for each for you after work. I think the sanctions one may be best explained in the msn link but don't remember.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That's a shame. What time do you finish work? Shouldn't take you more than say 1 day from now, right?

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I worked very late and do not have the time. I went through the links a dozen times each to compile the post.

I realize I am being too nice to you since it is obvious from your other comments you are invested in protecting the criminals and dominating the comment section like a reddit censor bot. You would never be satisfied no matter what.You can read the sources your self, i've got better shit to do. https://i.imgur.com/imyiDEn.png

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I made one more edit just for you

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay let me check it. Seems like you edited this section into the OP

If you want to know more details about how he is connected to the advancement of the j-31 and how the purchase helped China slip past existing sanctions I left plenty of links that go into the subjects in detail.

Which link?

Sure, yes, tell me how any of this relates to the J31? Which link should I be clicking

[–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Excellent points, here and below. Indeed, there's nothing illegal or odd about these investments and if we dig deeper, we can find numerous similar investments by US investors and especially by US politicians. This pathetic post shows the lengths to which Republicans are willing to go to develop disinformation. It only works with a voter base that is somewhat on the autistic spectrum and happily promotes lies and half-truths for their .01% fraudster political handlers.

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

we can find numerous similar investments by US investors and especially by US politicians.

Please post the names and info of these people working to help foreign military contractors, sanctioned as a national security threat, to get around sanctions to purchase our military tech. It will be between me and you. I won't forward the info to the proper officials, I swear on a ham sandwich.

[–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Specific trades:

https://www.capitoltrades.com/trades

This is one of the best resources, which you'll have to navigate to get more information on specific people:

https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances

Conflicts of interest are periodically examined:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/13/us/politics/congress-members-stock-trading-list.html

And much more... search:

investments of US politicians list

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That timeline is perfect!

They hack F35 program, then immediately begin moving to buy the supplier of the stealth technology, based on the info gathered from the hack.

The Bidens' shell company ensures they can buy the stealth technology company, despite sanctions and the oblivious huge danger to the US's national security.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's a fiction derived entirely from your imagination and is not supported by any of the links.

You might as well throw in Santa and Darth Vader in your story - their presence wouldn't make your story any less in touch with the reality of the links in the OP.

oblivious huge danger to the US's national security.

Nobody has even shown that Henniges are actually involved in an ongoing basis with F35.

Nobody has demonstrated that Henniges' anti-vibration tech is a secret, or national security, and not something that China could learn about on Wikipedia.

You are playing stupid fictional storytelling games with yourself, like a child.

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your insults and empty denial-ism (of your own timeline), just prove you a salty misinformation spreading Redditor. It does get very old.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Denial? You haven't made a proper argument with evidence, yet. Once you do, I'll approach your stance properly, but there's nothing wrong with me denying your imaginary speculation outright in a thread about links and sources

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I merely used your timeline and explained how it perfectly fits what you were saying it disproved....yet, I see you are confused.

[–]yellowsnow2[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I already proved him a liar. He refuses to read links. Not sure if it's a bot or someone using a translator that doesn't work on links.. or something... None of the thoughts in this post were my own, they all came from the links. It goes into further details but you get the drift.

A look at the research and development timelines of the F-35 and the J-31 illustrates the advantage that both hacking and the strategic acquisition of Henniges have given the Chinese. https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2023/08/02/blacklisted-chinese-military-manufacturer-acquired-u-s-stealth-technology-cfius-approval-through-relationship-with-hunter-and-joe-biden-n786239

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No confusion.

When I posted the true timeline, I wasn't inviting playwrights from saidit gen pop to conjure imaginary scenarios which might fit the timeline. There are of course an infinite number of imaginary scenarios, some more or less scandalous than the one you imagined.

You can't really accuse me of "denial" or being "confused", i just don't want to hear your daydream conspiracy garbage unless you have a link to back it up.

Was that clear enough? Perhaps its you who is confused. Are you going to engage in "denialism" now? Why don't you go and find some relevent research links that contribute to the conversation.

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Luckily, the Chinese realize that the 3 superpowers are impossible to conquer. They will conquer Taiwan (at great cost) but Japan has had decades to prepare for WWIII.

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

taiwan, if they are smart, should have already acquired sufficient bits and bobs to make a dozen or so crude a-bombs (hiroshima 15k yields) and if the sea invasion starts put the stuff together and sink a good part of the invasion fleet and possibly major military or even xi's house/bunker (the piper cub that landed in the kremlin delivery method)

japan should be ready to go beyond that - have a biden level insurance contingency - to cover having another puppet like biden in the empty chair when the chi-coms figure it is best to act

[–]ShoahKahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)