you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AmWomanDontCallMeBro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Or maybe it did take off, but it's proprietary only to certain people in certain circles. Not available to the rest of us peons in the general public.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. Maybe it did. But if it were a battery, easily produced storing 100x the energy, that was light weight… I mean. There would be unexplainable things happening.

Like there would be jets, that never used fuel. There would be some guy, that has a car that never needs fuel, there would be a person with like a flying hover board.

Tanks that can last forever. Airships that don’t need to land.

I mean. The shit we could do with a new battery that stored more energy and was lighter. It would be a significant change that I would think someone would notice.

[–]yellowsnow2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah I think hydrogen is the way to go. It is always best to mimic nature. The water cycle is how mother nature and Zeus get their rocks off. But the electrolysis methods currently used are like trying to stick a square peg in a round hole and just saying it doesn't work. It is extremely confusing as to why they don't just follow Stanley Meyer's patents. And also confusing why out of the entire HHO research community not a single one can read the old school but simple circuit from the patent's circuit diagram nor follow the step by step explanation in the patents.. It's like a glitch in the matrix. I'm working towards it but never seem to have a minute of free time. But fully understand everything about Meyer's way, physically and theoretically and it should work, but I haven't had a chance to verify.