Disappearing History on the Internet - all links 404'd

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Okay, it turns out GPT just makes up links.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Do you see how your paranoid need for a conspiracy led you to an incorrect position and now you had to delete everything.

You should look around your mental landscape for what other incorrect things which you believe in only because of your need to have a conspiracy theory

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Chillax little bro, I didn't realize chat-GPT made up links, now I do.

chat-GPT was still correct over the original point, obviously, kids were threatened with bayonets to accept desegregation. It just made up links to support that.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

But when you discovered the links didn't work, let's go through the steps you decided to take

  • you decided to create a s/conspiracy post about it

  • you decided to comment on s/whatever about it

  • you decided to type the absolute demonstrable falsehood "Chat-GPT is a glorified calculator". - it's actually terrible with numbers because it wasn't designed for that

  • you decided to type the absolute falsehood "this is exactly the sort of thing it's good at" when you asked it for links. It's absolutely not the sort of thing it's good at, as you've now realised

At no point did you try to validate your misunderstanding

You didn't do any reading

You didn't research the product you were using

You didn't try to create a coherent pattern of fact out of all the deleted links

You just decided...it's a conspiracy

And that's exactly what's wrong with you. That's precisely what's wrong with you retards, just digging a deeper and deeper dunning-kruger hole out of make-believe paranoid conspiracy theories

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ah, I see your problem. You misunderstand the purpose of a forum. It is discussion, and this is a conversation. It isn't a repository for facts. You may go away enlightened now 🙏

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oh - my B.

I thought people posted things they thought were conspiracies to s/conspiracy.

When, actually, we're pretending that musky didn't think it was a conspiracy, he just wanted to discuss this thing he was wrong about being a conspiracy. And that's why he deleted it when proven wrong.

Got it.

Hey when you're done pretending that you weren't super wrong here - you should look up how GPT and ChatGPT work, so that next time you won't have to pretend you didn't accidentally reveal the dunning-kruger crux of conspiracy-pattern thinking

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I thought it was a conspiracy, it wasn't, so I deleted it. It's not very complicated.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, but what does seem to be quite complicated, if getting you to understand:

You were wrong for reasons that are easy to understand in retrospect - you had a bias towards seeing a conspiracy and a bias against researching

Now apply that lesson to all the other fake conspiracies you believe in

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The process is the same as it ever was. The idea didn't hold up, was discarded. Perhaps you have heard of the scientific method, you should try building your searching abilities looking that one up.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, I see, so when you declare something is definitely a conspiracy, actually you're just testing whether or not it's true.

And the test results happen when someone like me, finally manages to convince you that you're confidently incorrect.

That's your standards of testing whether information is true or not.

You don't check it, you don't validate anything, it just becomes a solid part of your worldview until I come along and finally convince you that your standards of proof are "misinformed paranoid feelings"

That's how you test

Good grief