you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Literally just different image definition.

The pic on left looks nothing like the pumas

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I agree it doesn't look like the pumas, but we should be seeing some red and orange and not a giant blob of white.

I think I see the tag on the back of the shoe though, which means Vans https://media.breitbart.com/media/2023/03/covenant-school-shooter-surveillance-video-nashville-PD-640x480.jpg

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Those types of security cameras are not used for high resolution. A camera expert could do a better job than me to explain it, but the limits of the cameras and the settings they have programmed in can cause "noise" which would result in things like small patches of color being blended into that "white blob" along with the white stripe and white rubber strip above and below.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm still not sure. A small white stripe and a bunch of yellow have somehow made a giant white blob.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It has limitations and has to make sacrifices to get the overall picture and frame rate smooth. Sometimes it results in blurs. If you look through the entire video, you can see blurs throughout. Blending a small patch of yellow into the two larger sections of white is another result.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I donno. We have like 5+ seconds of clear HD video. Did you ever see the New Zealand mosque shooting video, where he walks into the hallway for the first time, and there is already a clip on the ground? My doubt levels are too high maybe.

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I watched it once and probably won't watch it again, even to look for that.

Look at the first picture above. You can see a blur above the right shoe on the pants leg. Also, there looks to be a clear black line between the stripe, or white blob, and the rubber midsole, unlike the Puma's. You have already found that they have the tag in back like Vans do.

[–]EternalSunset[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Watch the video for yourself if you don't believe it, you can clearly see her sneakers don't have any flame decals and that the white stripe is different from the bodycam's sneaker:

https://youtu.be/V6-dM6I6u4Q?t=52

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

The video showing a corpse foot wearing red/yellow flame shoes, for the other half of the story: https://xxx.livegore.com//rb-include/videos/3764675660.mp4 look at 2:14

I have no way to reconcile this discrepancy without seeing an end-to-end video of her activities that day. I now don't know what to think of this event. FINALLY s/conspiracy got me to change my mind by presenting proof for something odd

[–]package 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

How about go frame by frame in this video and realize that the yellow/red very quickly fades to looking like black with a white stripe depending on the lighting and size onscreen because chroma sub sampling is a thing. smh

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It doesn't though? And the camera has zero trouble with red colors as can be seen everywhere on the screen. The firethingy, the cap, the printer etc.

It doesn't even fade red. Just screenshot it and sample the color with paint. It's not dark red. It's black.

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's not an issue with red colors in general. It's an issue of small low contrast areas of red and yellow (yellow being green + red). Go frame by frame in the vid of the body and you will see frames that look more like black with a white stripe, albeit to a lesser degree.

Also it is worth thinking rationally and asking yourself if it makes any amount of sense that any entity would go to the trouble of staging such an event and then say "meh don't worry about the shoes they look close enough".

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

black to red, black to yellow, these are not low contrast

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yellow on white and dark red bordering black are definitely low contrast especially when the regions containing these colors are heavily pixelated; tf is wrong with you?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they're not heavily pixelated LMAO

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Small contrast areas? Explain to me how the color is black. It doesn't just look black, it is black. There is no red in it. The colors aren't shifted.

And look at what you're suggesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chroma_subsampling

It doesn't even do what you're claiming it would do. The debunking of this is hilarious. Where did you even get the idea that chroma subsampling would do this?

The important part is that the printed paper disagrees with your chroma subsampling explanation in an obvious way.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Tell us you didn't watch on a large screen with good colour rendering but use different words

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tell us you're schizophrenic and immediately treat anything you don't understand as a conspiracy and refuse to even consider any other explaination no matter how unreasonable or nonsensical the conspiracy is in context or how inconsistent it is vs any other conspiracy you've latched onto in the past.