you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Okay, lets look at the first paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332223001798

Volunteers were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups and orally treated with IVM as either, a tablet, solution, or capsules at 0.4 mg/kg in a three-phase crossover design. Blood samples were taken as dried blood spots (DBS) between 2 and 48 h post-treatment and IVM was analyzed by HPLC with fluorescence detection. IVM Cmax value was higher (P < 0.05) after the administration of the oral solution compared to treatments with both solid preparations. The oral solution resulted in a significantly higher IVM systemic exposure (AUC: 1653 ng h/mL) compared to the tablet (1056 ng h/mL) and capsule (996 ng h/mL) formulations. The simulation of a 5-day repeated administration for each formulation did not show a significant systemic accumulation.

So Ivermectin was given to three groups 3 different ways and the amount of Ivermectin in the blood was measured for each group. No one had CoVID. The effect on covid was not measured. The only thing that was measured was the efficiency of getting Ivermectin into the blood.

That doesn't show effectiveness against covid does it?

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're so dishonest, not worth my time

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You said the papers show effectiveness against CoVID.

The first one doesn't, but you call me dishonest.

What the actual fuck, man?

Do you not see the irony here?

You were lying, so I'm being dishonest? You must be Christian. You've got the hang of externalizing blame.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

cool story bro

lying kills people

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not all lies, but yes, the lies that you're telling has killed and is killing people.

That's why conservative districts in the US have higher death rates.

But I still don't get why you would claim that a paper with no investigation of CoVID, shows effectiveness of anything against covid.

I've read the paper, so it's not like you're going to convince me. Are you trying to convince you?

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not trying to convince you but I gave you an endless source of papers on ivermectins effetiveness against covid. You can "win" the debate by being dishonest and bad faith or you can do yourself a favor and read. I don't care if you are convinced or not, you are a waste of my time, but maybe you do care that your bad faith behaviour is causing people to die. Maybe you don't. Enjoy feeling the dopamine satisfaction of feeling that you won an online argument instead of educating yourself when given the chance by someone who started out engaging with you in good faith and has since lost interest in you.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I gave you an endless source of papers on ivermectins effetiveness against covid.

If you mean except the first one, say so.

If you don't, you're lying. That paper doesn't measure or attempt to measure effectiveness against covid.

Don't try to project your dishonesty on me.

someone who started out engaging with you in good faith and has since lost interest in you.

So long as i don't read any of the papers at your link, eh?

What did you expect when you linked to them?