you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mifu 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So, you're saying that the renowned cardiologist is spreading "fake news" that the vaxx is killing young men, eh? What are your qualifications to say that? 🚩

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So, you're saying that the renowned cardiologist is spreading "fake news"

That's so funny to me that you just simply accept he's a renowned cardiologist because an anonymous headline told you so.

Kind of illustrates the problem with conspiracy thinking: anything which even hints at confirming your biases, you immediately leap on it as the new truth.

Oh hey look. Apparently the British Heart Foundation have called his work "misleading and wrong". Some cardiologist. And he's selling a 21 day diet that will prevent you from getting covid. Imagine that. The grifter telling you not to get a vaccine is also selling you a 21 day program to make you immune to covid.

What are your qualifications to say that?

It's so funny to me that you ask this of me, but blindly accept the "renowned cardiologist" title because the headline which confirms your bias said so. Where was your curiosity back when you parroted their phrasing to me? Where was this healthy skepticism then? Dumbass

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

“The fact checking only goes in one direction.”

You tend to be a great example of this quote, Site_rly_sux

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok give me an example where you think that happened

[–]mifu 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

That's so funny to me that you just simply accept...

I do not simply accept since there is a plethora of evidence from multiple sources that he is correct. The vaxx is a scheme to kill off as many humans as possible. It's not necessary to be a savant to figure that out.

Oh, "dumbass" is it? You're blindly accepting the word of the bought off British Heart Foundation, aren't you? Is someone paying you to say such things? Because it sure looks that way to me.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

there is a plethora of evidence from multiple sources that he is correct

Ah so you've found a number of headlines which confirmed your biases. Got it.

the bought off British Heart Foundation, aren't you? Is someone paying you to say such things

Yes, the guy who is selling a 21 day diet to prevent me from getting covid is paying me to write about him and call him a "renowned cardiologist"

Again - where was this healthy skepticism when you read the anonymous article? Why does your curiosity only go in favour of your biases and not against them. Why aren't you at all curious about whether this 21-day-diet-grifter is paying for coverage

[–]mifu 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

More like I found credentialed people from whom I developed my opinions and statistics that overwhelmingly support my position. From this point on I will not respond to trolls with an agenda.

[–]Site_rly_sux 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it would be a helpful thing, for you to consider even if you just humour me with taking five seconds on it.

Your healthy skepticism led you to ask me whether I was being paid to argue with you.

Where was that skepticism when a 21-day diet grifter was called "renowned" by "anonymous newswire"?

Seriously just think about it for five seconds. Please just humour me.