Why I Still Think Alex Jones Was Right About Sandy Hook

submitted by raven9 from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't like all of the OP's logic, but assuming 5000 people - yes, that is a lot, perhaps too many, perhaps not enough. But how many people are in government running the global lockdown scamdemic? Waaaaaay more. Of course there are the big ops with some leaks - that we know of. But how many big ops do NOT have leaks? We will never know. Do you know how many whistleblowers there were for 9/11, JFK, etc? Too many to list. Yet they don't get coverage on the corporate media - for a reason. Unless you look you'll never find out.

Have you even tried to be skeptical?

Have a look.

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Of the 5000 people the majority aren't spooks, and a significant number are minors. Not even slightly plausible that that many people could be made to keep silent or even just keep their story straight.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rings within rings. Who has or controls the critical info? Those in charge. Everyone else has to hear it from them or indirectly, and trust what they are hearing. If there's an anomaly, unless it's too large to ignore, most folks won't shout about it. There are not 5000 testimonies to pour over, assuming people even wanted to document every minute detail, right or wrong, for later sleuths to discover.

This whole 5000 line of thought is ludicrous on its face.