Fire destroys the second largest hydroxychloroquine raw material supplier in the World. According to a fifteen year old study by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hydroxychloroquine is proven 100% effective at "obliterating" coronaviruses, within as little as six hours.

submitted by christnmusicreleases from halturnerradioshow.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]book-of-saturday 9 insightful - 9 fun9 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 9 fun -  (8 children)

Lol he's the town fool of this site, always defending the establishment narrative, no matter the topic. Some people just want to lick the establishment's boot. Hopefully he's not a shill, cause he's doing a shitty job not convincing anyone.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

He most certainly passes for a shill, along with a handful of others, often acting as a team.

No one can be exposed to sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much content on SaidIt and continue to hold so firmly fast to the bullshit pushed on us by the corporatocracy.

[–]Jesus 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Also odd that he has nine upvotes and not one commenter agrees with him.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You really don't understand how unpersuasive most of this shit is, do you?

You could subject me to flat and young earth shit all day every day, and I can still tell you the earth is round. Most of the "news" you guys post turns out to be debunked garbage. The dead voters that turned out to be alive. The poll workers filmed "throwing away ballots" that were just throwing away instruction sheets of a completely different size. Articles like this claiming HCQ is effective when most clinical trials indicate that it isn't. Hell, you've got the coronavirus subreddit being moderated by one of these young-earth clowns.

No, your half-baked conspiracies and anti-science nonsense claims aren't compelling, no matter how many of them end up on the front page.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

We're not talking about your strawman Flat Earth distraction and confusion bullshit. I've not even been exposed to any of the other nonsense you're now promoting as substantial refutation. You seem desperate, clutching at strawmens - almost like your job depends on it. If you knew anything about me you'd know that I'm ANTI-SCIENTISM not anti-science. If you don't know the difference you really need to learn about it.

Answer me these simple questions:

1) Are not corporations, government bodies, and individual government servants time and time and time again caught up in corruption scandals - many proven to be very problematic?

2) Are not the 5 giant media monopolies, at the least: guilty of narrow-minded groupthink, and worse: socially engineer manufactured consent for perpetual war, propagate consumer-based culture while being hypocritical via "climate crisis", and implementing other psychological operations?

3) Do you acknowledge that the shadow government via the deep state and secret agencies has profound and lasting effects on cultures and world affairs?

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I brought up flat earth so that you would understand how stupid the logic is. "No one can be exposed to this much information and not come to our side at least a bit, unless they're acting in bad faith" would only be true if what you're claiming passes the sniff test. "COVID-19 isn't a lung disease and you can't make a vaccine for it" is one of many examples of the obnoxious quackery you guys are peddling on this site, and it's not even remotely compelling as a narrative.

Do you think if you keep reframing the question you're eventually going to get a different answer?

1) Yes, but which government bodies, and what scandals? Just because drugs get through that we find out later have long-term side effects doesn't mean it's suddenly reasonable to believe that the FDA intentionally certifies bad drugs, and it certainly doesn't justify most of your obnoxious conspiracies.

2) Some of those things are true. Corporate media often has some agenda; it's just less nefarious than what you're implying here. That still doesn't justify most of your obnoxious conspiracies.

3) The CIA does shady (probably criminal) shit abroad, and agencies like the NSA spy in a manner which should be illegal domestically. That doesn't justify most of your obnoxious COVID-19 conspiracies.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't worry, I wouldn't expect most of you to find logic or reason persuasive.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Laughable, coming from one of our top shills. (Can I get a /u/Tom_Bombadil verification? See? I can play the validation and legitimization game too.)