you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Then we come to the CHABAD LUBAVITCH movement which backs Trump... that will be continued in another post."

See this people? This is an example of what not to do. See those etcetera marks telling you, that you are to finish the sentence? Ominous! Yet, he has said nothing. He's just vaguely implied Trump, and linked all of that, this entire submission to him, and is telling you to fill in the connections on your own. Which it would seem is the only part that u/Jesus actually wrote. As that the entire post was copy pasted from here:
https://watch-unto-prayer.org/eretz-israel-last-trump-noahide-laws.html

So this text has a whole page of it's own, where it is not broken up. So I ask, do we actually need a text post for this, where as this is a link aggregate site? Shouldn't we just link to the source?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, watchpairsite. I meant to link it in my next post. I don't want to link it because nobody will read it. A text post has the tremendous ability to get the lazy to read something they might of not have if it were made into a link post. But I am posting something else from Watchpair that is sourced. Just forgot to link to the site. Thanks.

BASICALLY, it was an excerpt and I'm posting a compilation right now from this site as we speak.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, Im posting a compilation concerning Trump and the Talmud soon that is from watch pair and other sites. It will be sourced. Just forgot to link the site because I saved this text and immediately forgot where I got the info from and then found it, after posting it, and started compiling some excerpts that will be for another post.

I save a lot of text in bulk and some of it is unsourced. Of course, I'll go back, and fix it.