Part 1

Bush wasn't really a Zionist. At least his father wasn't. George H. Walker Bush was the first president to CALL for a one state solution and try to give Palestinians full political rights. He even withheld billions of aid to Israel and for that reason had a Mossad hit on him. Just duckduckgo it or read the book "The High Priests of War" by Michael Collins Piper. Mossad wished to assassinate him.

As for George Bush, his entire family was an oil oligarchy. They had far different aspirations than the Likud. Ask youself this? What really happened on 9/11? Where was Bush? He was at a school reading to children. When he got the news by secret service did he look like he knew something? Not really. Instead his face showed complete confusion as if he finally realized why he became president. As if he was duped.

His father, yes, a war-criminal told reporters that the Neocons destroyed his sons presidency. But it's obvious his son did a lot of the destroying too.

As Guyenot noted in his ” From Yahweh to Zion” book , the “Seven Nations to destroy” theme for nine eleven comes from the OT. Wesley Clark mentioned it. He has a Jewish father that comes from a long line of Rabbis.

Six were already taken out, Iran is the last one not yet taken out. Thus, the endless calls from our Zion Age of Faith MSM to finish the job. There are 613 mitzvahs ( commandments) for religious Jews. The 187th one is the Seven Nations to destroy.

The 187th mitzvah is that we are commanded to kill and destroy the seven nations [of Canaan]1 because they are the prime worshippers and original source of idolatry.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/961561/jewish/Positive-Commandment-187.htm

And we understand it that there have been many Zionists in Israel who celebrate Purim. There's even a photograph of children dressed up as the twin towers with planes stuck in them.

Clark was asked the same question about the neocons and the 7 country war years later and he denied ever mentioning it and basically ran away from the question. Something tells me that Clark might have been working for the Bush side, still corrupt but was neutral when it came to the neocons only until he got a cushy job.

The admin for wtcdemolition.com, in an amazon review details this better than anyone else. If you can observe that the US government wasn’t and isn’t a one track monolith things make much more sense:

"There appears to be an attempt to deflect suspicion from the faction of Israeli and American Zionists who most likely planned and executed 9/11 onto the Anglo-American/Arab power bloc the former see as their main competition for influence and control over the U.S. Most powerfully symbolized by the close relationship between the Bush family and the oil-rich monarchies, this power bloc, however undemocratic and corrupt itself, has long been a thorn in the side of Israel’s ambitions for regional hegemony, and as such has also for years been a favorite bogeyman of the Zionist dominated liberal end of the media and academic spectrum. (Read John MacDonald’s Book ‘United States of Israel,’ James Petras’s book ‘The Power of Israel in the Untied States,’ which illustrates that the Iraq War that was waged was not in the interests of oil.)”

"That the criticisms leveled against them have long been valid, as this group has its own hegemonic ambitions (that manifested itself, for example, in numerous subversions of popular will around the world when those movements threatened their position), is no reason to assume that because many of its members were in a position to assist in the execution of 9/11 that they actually did so, however tempting it may be.”