you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The are saying it's a TOS violation. I looked through the rules and we didn't break anything!

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Did you post personally identifying information? Reddit is not the FBI, has no ability to verify your claims, and could be used to attack someone by proxy using faked evidence. So if you did in fact post addresses as the comments claim, then you very much did violate TOS.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nope. I just linked a thread where they got banned. the thread just a had public business listed as pizza delivery. it only had two rewiewers of the business. one had wrote a lot of reviews for places in israel which I found very odd.

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to the /r/Libertarian mods, it is a TOS violation to criticise rules against the distribution of child pornography, even in the context of quoting oneself to explain the reason for a past ban somewhere else. As a strong advocate for freedom of speech and information, I've learned that it is best to pretend pedophiles and child pornography don't exist, at least on Reddit, because when I extend my beliefs on freedom of speech and information to that, even in the context of fictional work, it ends up a lot more controversial than I could have ever imagined. I guess they are censoring everything related to pedophiles now, even things opposing them?