you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Very interesting point. I've been thinking the same. Let's not forget that the "alternative" sites (like this one we are on) are being allowed to broadcast. The fact that we are allowed at all to see something in a public sphere makes me very suspicious. Beware the "alternative hero". If the alternative world rallies around someone to take power and wield it, we've lost the game. The only game to work toward is destroying the structures which enable anyone to wield power over large groups of people. The unlikeliness of this game being played, however (I've never seen anyone in history intentionally destroy the capacity for an oligarchy to wield power), makes it a pipe dream. At least it gives us a light to look at, however, even if we can never approach it.

[–]0rco 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

We need to start dropping names like Robert F Kennedy, tulsi gabbard, tucker carlson. These guys seem to be the control.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Limited hangouts.