Climate groups demand Big Tech censor climate change "misinformation"

submitted by [deleted] from reclaimthenet.org

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Computer models are set to understand the climate.

Climate prediction models work on worst case scenario.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/5851667173001

Was it. Can you link me to this document?

Fauci's Mask Timeline

https://youtu.be/tRE59LJc6CA

I guess the science isn't always settled.

I never heard any propaganda claiming 100% effectiveness of masks or vaccines.

It's not my fault you live under a rock. If you read an echo chamber of scientific study, you will always reach the same conclusion.

If it's not settled then there must be some arguments for the earth being flat.

I've seen no flat earth argument that can't be refuted with simple science. That said, I personally have no physical way of observing the earth at any great distance other than to rely on that which is provided for us. That's not to say I refute the information given to us, I just find the idea of this being fraudulent unlikely. Whereas to claim carbon is causing global warming and that taxing it will make it all better, that has a likely scenario of making people rich.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Climate prediction models work on worst case scenario.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/5851667173001

The Cato Institute are one of the bodies heavily funded by fossil fuel and mining interests. In return they lie about climate change for the public.

The reality is that climate models have been about right. https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

Fauci's Mask Timeline

No, the government policy document.

It's not my fault you live under a rock. If you read an echo chamber of scientific study, you will always reach the same conclusion.

No vaccine is 100% effective.

That said, I personally have no physical way of observing the earth at any great distance other than to rely on that which is provided for us.

That's not the only evidence. There's the different time zones, the way that the moon appears rotated depending on your latitude, and that different stars are visible. A flat earth would need some new theory of gravitation, which you'd need to supply. There's multiple lines of evidence, just like climate change.

Whereas to claim carbon is causing global warming and that taxing it will make it all better, that has a likely scenario of making people rich.

You're against science because it might change taxation policy?