all 5 comments

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

this was purely a fiscal decision-The people who watch that channel are 10 yrs old, and dont spend money- why should YT pay him?

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are the target audience. Advertisers want to implant brand loyalty. Propagandists want to implant party loyalty. Kids don't have fully developed brains and can't tell bullshit from truth. He has the most sought after demographic. They are sabotaging him because he does not push their ideology, nothing more and nothing less.

[–]CarlDung 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

10r old are easier to manipulate to start asking stuff from their parents.

same thing with justin bieber back in the days, 10yr old girls have money through their parents

[–]beethy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nonsense article as most of it plainly isn't true.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really? You can go to his channel and see the views on his videos are way down.

Big Tech censorship is widely applauded by the left. Why's it implausible?