all 7 comments

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully.

What if I told you not all Jews believe that stuff?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You'd have to prove it. Also, they might not SAY they believe it, but when the time comes that they face liver failure, let's just say they aren't going to protest when a liver suddenly shows up out of nowhere. So they'll gladly benefit from such crimes.

Moreover, Jews are indoctrinated and brainwashed since birth to deceive goys. It is, you could say, a "cardinal value" in their belief system. Now tell me, will somebody trained since birth to lie to you going to tell you the truth? The answer starts with N and ends with O.

[–]portace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"accuse others of that which you are guilty"

they seem to love this method

[–]IkeConn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Seems like they would start with the peripheral organs to keep the donor alive until fully harvested. You know; maximize returns.

[–]Heter0ph0be4Life 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

What about butt extraction?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OP knows about that already