Colorado Bill Requires "Re-Education" For Parents Who Refuse The COVID-19 Vaccine

submitted by codedtestament from zerohedge.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

This is an online education module.

SB-163 information:

https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb20-163

It basically says a child/student may be admitted to school without vaccination for religious or personal reasons if they fill out the appropriate forms and watch the education module.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

They should send doctors who recommend the vaccine to education classes.

Vaccines Forever: Non-specific effects you should know — Part 1

[–]beermeem 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It should simply be required that the warning label of every vaccine be read aloud in its entirety prior to being administered.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That would be a decent starting point for actual vaccine education.

[–]Jac0b777 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Definitely not as bad as I thought looking at the title (actually good news in our modern day dystopia, since many schools require mandatory vaccinations for attendance). But it is Zero Hedge after all, their sensationalized articles are legendary.

[–]jamesK_3rd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The irony of your statement is i bet you don't make such comments when referring to the NYT or WaPo, who actively ban content that "does violence against the journos" or whose motto is that democracy dies in darkness.

The fact is that people have bias, they bring that bias with them to work. Perhaps there was a time that the editor's of such outlets attempted to reign in bias or simply listed their media as biased in a particular direction. (XXX Republican Gazette or the XXX Democrat Times are examples that still exist today).

We now live in a time where media and editors claim impartiality louder and like never before while everyone knows they aren't wearing any clothes.

Refute the content not the source. Just as RT is the propaganda arm of the Russians, CNN and NYT are the propaganda arm of the DNC.

[–]Jac0b777 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Dude, I totally make such comments regarding NYT, WaPo, CNN,.... on Reddit all the time. You are fighting against a straw-man that doesn't exist. Basically, because you have partisan bias, you think I have one as well and somehow adore mainstream media (and I assume - left leaning media?).

In my view, the vast, vast majority of MSM is total trash. I actually tend to go to RT for more unbiased news, that's how little faith I have in Western media (to be fair, RT may not be the best source on what's happening in Russia or China, but it readily calls out the propaganda and bias in Western media).

So there is literally zero irony in my statement. You are just blindly assuming things about me that aren't true.

[–]whereswhat 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have had this problem before too. Apparently it is difficult for some people to understand that it is possible to distrust both MSM and zerohedge.