you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

moral relativism is codeword for satanism which uses ritual child abuse to propagate it's power from generation to generation.

https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-the-kakistocracy-tjeerd-andringa-on-the-corbett-report/

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Satanism is often codeword for lazy label narrow thinking.

But there are indeed problems a plenty.

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

It can be, however often it's a quite succinct descriptor of those who indulge in selfish and destructive deviance, often at the expense of others via manipulations and deceit. Therefore places the fulfillment of their ego driven desires as if it was a higher law that supersedes respect and reverence to others and life in general.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Naw.

"those who indulge in selfish and destructive deviance, often at the expense of others via manipulations and deceit"

That could apply to drug users, retailers, artists, corporate executives, musicians, actors, mechanics, bankers, Zionists, Wahabbists, politicians, priests, etc.

Indulgent Epicurean egotists may be lousy humans, but they are not all Satanists (though some may be, consciously or not).

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Like you said, whether they are conscious of it or not, they are in effect practising the concepts of Satanism. Hence, it's why the label can be thrown around loosely without the person being a literal one.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes the label can be thrown around loosely, but it's not very precise.

"He's a bad person." What does that even mean? A serial killer, Satanist, crook, pervert, pessimist, lazy, not very organized, doesn't tip? "Bad" is just soooo non-descript and imprecise. So is Satanist, with all it religious dogma shit piled on top.

You can't mistake what a Machiavellian and doctor do, though you may ask what kind of doctor are they. Being a Machiavellian, you know they're manipulative, lying, scamming, greedy, evil fuckers with deep dark secrets and entanglements.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

satanism is the core ideology of all radicalisms that ever existed in history. in this case look no further than saul alinsky's 'rules for radicals' being dedicated to lucifer (who he calls the original radical). it's the actual antifa manual. and satanism always goes hand in hand with pedofilia (child sacrifice), sodomy and antisemitism.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Meh. You say Satanism, I say Machiavellianism.

Whether you're with the ruling class or their "radical" sheep dogs, their goals are the same - full spectrum dominance by any and all means.

I would consider myself a non-extremist, yet extreme. A radical but not their radical, if by radical you mean against their system.

I would call myself a Satanist if it actually meant something and/or I bought into it.

You say Satanism, I say Machiavellianism.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

satanism predates machiavellianism..

[–]joewest1313 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Try Luciferianism if you want to get to the center of the shrubbery maze.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Well that is the idea that humans can become God's. Lucifer in lore isn't Satan but a watcher that fell, ie. a fallen angle that now resides in hell as one of the chief fallen angels who works for Satan.

[–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"We are made in God's image."

That means we have the potential to be like him. While other animals have great strength and claws we had to create our own. From the invention of the bow, to the gun, to nukes. We, as a species, can do anything. Cats that glow in the dark. Land on the moon. One day connect ourselves to machines to leave these fleshbags behind. Are we not gods, like Our Father before us?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, of course, like Christ who comes from him. It means following "The Way." For you can do greater works than I.

Land on the moon.

Doubtful, but that is neither here nor there.

We can never be God because we are God's creation in God's universe that is ruled by the principalities of darkness. We can only be like Christ, and we must strive to follow him or fall into iniquity.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

My dad predates me. Doesn't mean he's always correct.

Satanism has too much religious stigma, esoteric nonsense and misinformation, and a touch of wild side charisma to many.

Machiavellianism is simply about manipulation feeding lusts for power. Clearer. The long name is a problem though.

Also, you can call anyone Machiavellian, whether they are or aren't ambitiously evil and it can still stick as your opinion (less so on non-political figures).

You can't call anyone a Satanist and have it stick - unless they actually are. It's just an insult.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True, but Machiavellianism is part and parcel of Satan's doctrine. Neocons are big admiriers of Machiavelli.