you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Naw.

"those who indulge in selfish and destructive deviance, often at the expense of others via manipulations and deceit"

That could apply to drug users, retailers, artists, corporate executives, musicians, actors, mechanics, bankers, Zionists, Wahabbists, politicians, priests, etc.

Indulgent Epicurean egotists may be lousy humans, but they are not all Satanists (though some may be, consciously or not).

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Like you said, whether they are conscious of it or not, they are in effect practising the concepts of Satanism. Hence, it's why the label can be thrown around loosely without the person being a literal one.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes the label can be thrown around loosely, but it's not very precise.

"He's a bad person." What does that even mean? A serial killer, Satanist, crook, pervert, pessimist, lazy, not very organized, doesn't tip? "Bad" is just soooo non-descript and imprecise. So is Satanist, with all it religious dogma shit piled on top.

You can't mistake what a Machiavellian and doctor do, though you may ask what kind of doctor are they. Being a Machiavellian, you know they're manipulative, lying, scamming, greedy, evil fuckers with deep dark secrets and entanglements.