You said it's very easy and yet you haven't shown a large majority of jews that push trans stuff

Just look at the surnames and early lives of many of the organizers, media publishers, etc. that publish pro-trans shit, you'll notice a pattern very quickly.

Even if it's a few people, how does that correspond to the majority of jews

Well, if there's greatly differing opinions on this, you'd expect major Jewish pushback. But even the supposedly conservative jews either outright support it (for everyone else, of course, not for them). However, there really isn't any major pushback coming form jews that I have seen.

This is all not to mention that even if a majority of jews disagree, the fact that a suspiciously large proportion of pro-trans organizers and activists are jewish is very difficult to argue being a coincidence. You said it yourself: they're 2% of the population, why do they have such vast overrepresentation in media, politics, banking, and, most relevantly to this conversation, "social activism", much of which is liberal and postmodernist in nature?

how a tiny minority of jews would some how subjugate billions of non whites especially black people who were to believe hate everyone(especially whites)and would see jews as white and remove them from power?

Firstly, indirect subjugation is still subjugation. There's a reason so many third world countries had "spontaneous" revolutions and have regimes either propped up formerly by the Soviet Union or ones propped up by the CIA/US Government. These regimes, even if ruled by natives, were ruled by natives friendly to the foreign powers that actually held the reigns. This is basic colonial administration simply on a larger scale; during European colonialism similar "collaborationist" natives were used as governors and administrators, same concept.

This also ignores the fact that this argument is fundamentally flawed. You could easily say the same about White people: how could a minority of Whites administrate overseas colonies if the locals hated them and wanted to kill them? By your logic, the obvious conclusion is that colonialism never occurred.

Removing a ruling class from power is not a simple affair, especially if that ruling class purposefully obfuscates and nebulizes itself, hiding behind deception, proxies, and complex systems of control and influence rather than direct and obvious colonialism. You obviously don't see massive buildings labelled "DA JOOZ HIDEOUT (no goyim allowed)" like some children's movie or hostile military takeover, instead you see friendly politicians, companies, etc. enforcing their masters' will indirectly through lobbying, creation of dependence, and other such underhanded and indirect methods.

Also, the conflict between groups (ideological, ethnic, religious, etc.) in Africa always means that they can simply promise guns or support to one side or the other to keep the conflict going and the people they subjugate distracted, the same is done in the US, except instead of two irrelevant local ethnic groups firing AKs at one another, it's keeping people at odds over (THE CURRENT THING) and distracted from the real issue.