TRANSGENDERAmerican Girl Doll brand goes full groomer

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You said it's very easy and yet you haven't shown a large majority of jews that push trans stuff.Even if it's a few people, how does that correspond to the majority of jews?Also please explain to me how a tiny minority of jews would some how subjugate billions of non whites especially black people who were to believe hate everyone(especially whites)and would see jews as white and remove them from power?

[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You said it's very easy and yet you haven't shown a large majority of jews that push trans stuff

Just look at the surnames and early lives of many of the organizers, media publishers, etc. that publish pro-trans shit, you'll notice a pattern very quickly.

Even if it's a few people, how does that correspond to the majority of jews

Well, if there's greatly differing opinions on this, you'd expect major Jewish pushback. But even the supposedly conservative jews either outright support it (for everyone else, of course, not for them). However, there really isn't any major pushback coming form jews that I have seen.

This is all not to mention that even if a majority of jews disagree, the fact that a suspiciously large proportion of pro-trans organizers and activists are jewish is very difficult to argue being a coincidence. You said it yourself: they're 2% of the population, why do they have such vast overrepresentation in media, politics, banking, and, most relevantly to this conversation, "social activism", much of which is liberal and postmodernist in nature?

how a tiny minority of jews would some how subjugate billions of non whites especially black people who were to believe hate everyone(especially whites)and would see jews as white and remove them from power?

Firstly, indirect subjugation is still subjugation. There's a reason so many third world countries had "spontaneous" revolutions and have regimes either propped up formerly by the Soviet Union or ones propped up by the CIA/US Government. These regimes, even if ruled by natives, were ruled by natives friendly to the foreign powers that actually held the reigns. This is basic colonial administration simply on a larger scale; during European colonialism similar "collaborationist" natives were used as governors and administrators, same concept.

This also ignores the fact that this argument is fundamentally flawed. You could easily say the same about White people: how could a minority of Whites administrate overseas colonies if the locals hated them and wanted to kill them? By your logic, the obvious conclusion is that colonialism never occurred.

Removing a ruling class from power is not a simple affair, especially if that ruling class purposefully obfuscates and nebulizes itself, hiding behind deception, proxies, and complex systems of control and influence rather than direct and obvious colonialism. You obviously don't see massive buildings labelled "DA JOOZ HIDEOUT (no goyim allowed)" like some children's movie or hostile military takeover, instead you see friendly politicians, companies, etc. enforcing their masters' will indirectly through lobbying, creation of dependence, and other such underhanded and indirect methods.

Also, the conflict between groups (ideological, ethnic, religious, etc.) in Africa always means that they can simply promise guns or support to one side or the other to keep the conflict going and the people they subjugate distracted, the same is done in the US, except instead of two irrelevant local ethnic groups firing AKs at one another, it's keeping people at odds over (THE CURRENT THING) and distracted from the real issue.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So because there's really no big push back from jews means they support it?What about the non jews who don't say anything as well?Do they support it also?The reason many third world countries had spontaneous revolutions was because they wanted freedom and independence from the colonial powers at the time.As for your last part,you're describing the fundamental problem with capitalism itself.Also i didn't make jews out to be cartoon villians,its the people who think they've been planning world domination for hundreds to possibly thousands of years to now and think every one of their ancestors passed down their plans to do it.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So because there's really no big push back from jews means they support it? What about the non jews who don't say anything as well? Do they support it also?

Most people, Jew or not, are either ignorant of this control or deny it completely despite evidence. This doesn't mean they necessarily support it, but they also don't help to alleviate the issue.

The reason many third world countries had spontaneous revolutions was because they wanted freedom and independence from the colonial powers at the time.

What does this have to do with anything? if you're trying to say "if jews really controlled the world people would revolt", refer to my previous point about obfuscation, as well as the fact that revolutions require a certain level of "metastization" or public support, as well as a number of other factors to come together for a revolution to become feasible. As I said, Jewish control is not a present, open thing; it uses subterfuge and multiple levels of separation and influence to accomplish goals, which makes fighting back much more difficult.

As for your last part, you're describing the fundamental problem with capitalism itself.

I really don't get what you mean by this. Do you seriously imply that large conspiracies are some new phenomenon like capitalism? This is common sense if you don't want people to know you're in control: delegate, deny, and indirectly influence. And no, it is not inherent to capitalism either; many groups of many ideological motivations have used such tactics throughout history. It's standard practice internally and externally to delegate power to more efficiently, and in some cases secretly, exert control.

Also i didn't make jews out to be cartoon villians

I don't recall saying you did.

people who think they've been planning world domination for hundreds to possibly thousands of years to now and think every one of their ancestors passed down their plans to do it.

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the point; the idea is not that every single jew is taught some secret plan and they pass it down, it's that Jewish culture and the Judaic religion prioritize the control and enslavement of non-Jews. These ideas are spoken plainly by rabbis and jews, they're written in the Talmud, and they're evident in most interactions with jews, especially religious ones.

This is not at all unrealistic either. If Jews using their undue power to enact their cultural and religious idea of their superiority is somehow ridiculous, then why are the Freemasons, who are mostly gentiles from my knowledge but have similar goals, so suspect? And since you seem to despise capitalism, I'm sure you know of similar such societies made up of the ultra-rich?

Just look at the statistics if you still doubt me; Jews are, as you said, 2% of the population, so why then do they have such vast overrepresentation in government, the upper classes of society, et cetera? Why is it that despite this fact, any criticism of this circumstance considered "vile and hateful" when in the modern day throwing shitfits about the rich and about White people having similar proportions of control or representation in these societal classes is practically a responsibility according to some?

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Let me ask you this.How can jews control everything when only one of the ten wealthiest families is jewish from what i see here? https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052416/top-10-wealthiest-families-world.asp And they're only the 7th wealthiest.Unless you'll claim these people are hiding that they're jewish or claim that more powerful jews control them(which there is no evidence of)then the problem seems to be mega corporations that push LGBT stuff for profit and not jews themselves.Literally in your first post you admit most people are ignorant about what's going on with the trans stuff, including jews. As for you're last part,i honestly question if you've ever met a jew before.Most of the jews i've met are secular/atheist and don't even practice their religion.Also by using nutcase extremists examples then you should also hear about how Christians subverted and enslaved non Christian nations and forced them to become Christians.Btw i don't know where you're getting the idea people can't criticize rich jews.Jeffrey Epstein was jewish and i don't hear anyone shouting "racism" when hating him.It's only when people try to make it seem like him being jewish has anything to do with the bad things that he did.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Let me ask you this.How can jews control everything when only one of the ten wealthiest families is jewish from what i see here? https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052416/top-10-wealthiest-families-world.asp And they're only the 7th wealthiest.

"Only the seventh wealthiest" doesn't mean much when you're talking about multi-billionaires. In any case, the top 10 doesn't really matter... I was talking about statistics of ALL Million and Billionaires.

Unless you'll claim these people are hiding that they're jewish or claim that more powerful jews control them(which there is no evidence of)then the problem seems to be mega corporations that push LGBT stuff for profit and not jews themselves.

Firstly, yes, although somewhat uncommon, Jews do on occasion purposefully or otherwise obfuscate their heritage through plastic surgery, name changes (or tactful marriage) and other such methods. Plenty of famous Jews have gotten nosejobs for obvious reasons.

Many mega-corporations have Jewish higher-ups and many more having major Jewish investors. Take, for instance, the infamous BlackRock financial: All 3 founders were Jews.

And it certainly doesn't stop there. Look here for a large list of influential Jewish financiers (Apologies for using Wikipedia in these examples, but these are lists with verifiable information, not to mention that Wikipedia's bias would almost certainly be pro-Jewish if at all) and here for a similar list for those in publishing and media. Needless to say, these sectors alone are incredibly powerful, especially when one considers that not only are these lists likely incomplete, but also likely omit "smaller" players or those with influential and important but far less publicized official roles in companies. This interest is even more obscene when one considers that many of the listed companies are some of the largets in their respective sectors, AND they almost universally trend towards "hyper-liberal" viewpoints and propagandization.

While not all mega-corporations are Jewish owned, obviously, and not even all jewish-owned corporations/megacorps are these hyper-liberal types, a vast majority of hugely influential companies have some amount of Jewish involvement through investment or direct control and many of them are pushing these harmful societal trends.

Literally in your first post you admit most people are ignorant about what's going on with the trans stuff, including jews.

Firstly, this has no impact on my point. My point in my original comment was that Jews have a suspicious and statistically anomalous degree of influence and involvement in the brainwashing of young children to mutilate themselves/their kids. I never, to my memory, stated that every single jew is an ultra-powerful propaganda machine, but rather that most jews have knowing or unknowing involvement in such movements due to their culture and religion.

As for you're last part,i honestly question if you've ever met a jew before.Most of the jews i've met are secular/atheist and don't even practice their religion.

The issue is, many of the religious motivators I touched on are not simply religious, but cultural as well. Just like in Christian, Islamist, etc. regions, even secular or atheist people, institutions, etc. are influenced by the religion of the region and religious concepts, morals, etc. bleed into secular practice and culture regardless.

The same is true of Jews, and it seems many of these cultural bleedthroughs are related to the religious belief Jews have that they are superior to all other humans, and that other humans should be exterminated and enslaved.

Also by using nutcase extremists examples then you should also hear about how Christians subverted and enslaved non Christian nations and forced them to become Christians.

Last time I checked, the main machination by which colonialism and Christian Evangelism were spread was by openly proselytizing via missions and the like, no "subversion" or subterfuge involved. I should also mention that these same Christian institutions occasionally and quite famously spoke out against colonialism and its horrific treatment of the natives, such as the very well known case of Bartolome de las Casas.

Trying to compare Jews and Christians in this regard is apples and oranges in a multitude of ways.

Btw i don't know where you're getting the idea people can't criticize rich jews.Jeffrey Epstein was jewish and i don't hear anyone shouting "racism" when hating him.It's only when people try to make it seem like him being jewish has anything to do with the bad things that he did.

The thing is, people get called antisemites, conspiracy theorists, etc. for criticizing jews or jewish-operated companies constantly. Take for instance the famous PornHub self-own where they, in Freudian fashion, they called their critics antisemites when nobody had brought up the jewish nature of their operators.

As for the Epstein thing, they made sure to never mention his Jewishness and constantly whine about antisemitism any time they talked about him, which they made sure to do as little as humanly possible. In fact, merely mentioning the officially available and confirmed facts about his case and his dealings with politicians in any public setting would result in plenty of pejoratives like "conspiracy theorist" and "antisemite" thrown your way, even if you mention nothing about jews.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well,let's take a look at history because i learned in 10th grade that the reason for why jews took banking is because it was considered a sin for Christians to work at banks and therefore many Jews worked there instead since they weren't allowed to have higher-class jobs.From the old testament
"Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess. Deuteronomy 23:19-20

The medieval Christian Church interpreted this to mean that, similarly, no Christian could charge interest upon a loan to a fellow Christian. Lending money without interest was perfectly fine. Still, of course, this put a great roadblock in the way of financial development. However, there was one exception: neither the Jewish rabbis nor the Christian Church cared about loans between Jews and Christians. So, the Jews - driven out of farming and the trades by increasingly-discriminatory legislation - turned en masse to this opening.

This did not make the Jews popular, of course. Kings who were themselves deeply in debt to the well-established Jewish banking families periodically confiscated all debts owed to Jews. The stereotype of the money-grubbing Jewish banker, still popular in anti-Semitic circles, dates from this era. What finally ended their monopoly was Christian merchant families discovering loopholes, such as investing in businesses or demanding repayment in another currency, in the Church's prohibition on interest. From the same source wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_antisemitism#Middle_Ages Also i find your second part bizarre.Are you saying jewish purposely marry non jews and get surgery to hide that they're jewish?Do you have evidence of the source, and not just some random quote/

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well,let's take a look at history because i learned in 10th grade that the reason for why jews took banking is because it was considered a sin for Christians to work at banks and therefore many Jews worked there instead since they weren't allowed to have higher-class jobs.From the old testament "Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess. Deuteronomy 23:19-20

The medieval Christian Church interpreted this to mean that, similarly, no Christian could charge interest upon a loan to a fellow Christian. Lending money without interest was perfectly fine. Still, of course, this put a great roadblock in the way of financial development. However, there was one exception: neither the Jewish rabbis nor the Christian Church cared about loans between Jews and Christians. So, the Jews - driven out of farming and the trades by increasingly-discriminatory legislation - turned en masse to this opening.

I should point out that usury is not "necessary" in any way. That's like saying "God told Christians not to murder people, so of course Jews had to pick up the slack!". An inane statement meant only to justify their crimes.

Also i find your second part bizarre.Are you saying jewish purposely marry non jews and get surgery to hide that they're jewish?Do you have evidence of the source, and not just some random quote

Yes, I am. Look at Natalie Portman, for instance. She got a nosejob and changed her name to obfuscate her ancestry and racial identity. I could find plenty more examples.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So because jews don't see banking as sinful means they're evil.Buddy,you need to go out more and realize the world doesn't revolve around Christianity.Aslo,you do realize actors do that all the time including non jewish ones right?According to Natalie, she wanted her paternal grandmother's last name.There's nothing to indicate that she did it because she's part of a secret jewish world government organization.That's the problem with people like you.You think if jews do something you don't understand that means they're up to no good.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So because jews don't see banking as sinful means they're evil.

I mean, yeah. The fact that they not only see usury as non-sinful but religious duty is pretty absurd and vile.

Buddy,you need to go out more and realize the world doesn't revolve around Christianity

The Eurosphere does, or at least did, so yeah, Jews coming in and subverting and destroying our societies and exploiting loopholes in our legal systems and moral codes is easily worthy of the hate they receive.

People like you complain to no end about how evil Christians are for colonizing people and ignoring their """perfectly acceptable""" morals and practices then celebrate Jews doing the same to us.

Aslo,you do realize actors do that all the time including non jewish ones right?

There's a difference between a pseudonym and actively obfuscating your real name and identity to assimilate yourself with your target audience.

According to Natalie, she wanted her paternal grandmother's last name.

Is that why she got a nosejob too?

There's nothing to indicate that she did it because she's part of a secret jewish world government organization

You keep saying this, which makes it evident that you either didn't read or ignored by actual explanations of my opinions in previous replies.

That's the problem with people like you.You think if jews do something you don't understand that means they're up to no good.

Well, considering the precedent I have to look back on, I don't feel that such an attitude is too remiss.