you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SMCAB 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

You forgot boobiebro, dingoatemytaco, nodiggity, and wigger.

[–]jamesK_3rd 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Is this just an assumption based on writing styles or some such?

Like, the only real method I can think of is to validate via previous IP address, and it's think only M7 can do that.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Is this just an assumption based on writing styles or some such?

A person's writing is identifiable, not just from the style, but the content, philosophy, and mannerisms, grammar, word choice... Read it long enough and you can identify it. Socks is a particularly easy case because his ideology stands him apart, there aren't too many lefty liberals here who have a penchant for posting compromised news sources (WaPo, Rolling Stone, etc) as legit.

[–]SMCAB 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

The Unabomber got caught using linguistics from one paper he wrote.

Socks is on here daily saying the same exact shit, the same exact way, over and over. It's glaring really.

You can only capitalize GOP and MAGAtard, end your word salad rants with an obfuscating question or two that a twelve year old would ask so many times, when you're the only one doing it on a website with 13 people.