you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Chipit 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

    This comment makes no sense. Another tactic is polluting discussions with nonsense to derail the conversation.

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Not gon'o lie: I thought he was the Americans bot at first.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Seems /u/Ilubalu is mainly thinking out loud, rather than making an explicit point.

    Regarding one of his/her points, I've been curious about the way in which this post-Reddit 'free speech' news aggregator website functions, if it's so easy for the alt-right, or also 8Chan folks, to manipulate the discourses. It's also been interesting to see the moderates come and go. I am, howver, impressed with the admins, for keeping the website management somewhat simplified.

    [–]Chipit 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Always front and center defending the website disruptors, this account is.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Doesn't make sense.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    I actually agree with you here.

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    if it's so easy for the alt-right, or also 8Chan folks, to manipulate the discourses.

    He's implying that "it's not his fellow leftists" who are canceling and censoring people off the internet.

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    If that was his only point then I'd change my mind to disagree, but his obvious one-sided bias and omission excluding the Leftist asstrolls doesn't negate the fact that the discourses are manipulated - or at least they try.

    Also, the "simplified management" has its pros and cons.

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    It appears to be a criticism of "lovers of freedom and capitalism", and the claim is that "freedom is threatening". Implicit in this context is that freedom of speech should be curtailed, and regulated.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The OP is about spam and thus "freedom to abuse and disrespect". I didn't read that "freedom of speech should be curtailed" or calling for censorship so much as simply stating that freedom has its pros and cons.