May I post non pornographic depictions of women's boobies on s/tits?

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 8 fun4 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 8 fun -  (28 children)

This is the top thread on my feed, providing yet more evidence that I live in a world of morons.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Evidence the hijacking of this website is real and ongoing. They're not organic upvotes

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

Everybody likes boobies.

[–]fschmidt 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

Another thing about modern morons is that they are all talk, no action. Boobie action makes sense. Boobie talk does not.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

I just want to clarify what is allowed at s/Tits. It already exists, people are posting to it. Slapped on some css. Loki even offered me one to use.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (15 children)

Good to know you're in contact with LXXXVIII.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yep saidits days are numbered before it goes full reddit now

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

He was joking. He asked me and I pointed him at /s/CorbettCommenters for my SimpleTweaks CSS.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

I wasn't joking, loki sent me a css thing. I don't know why it's a big deal. It's not like we're nazi pen pals. I mean they're nazis but I'm not giving them the silent treatment.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Charlie Chapman was not exactly what one would call a patriot.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      And?

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Dammit lol

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Yeah that wasn't a joke, but that's like the shittiest image to prove it. Loki did send me a PM with a css that'll I'd like to implement in my other sub. I do appreciate it even though I don't agree with y'alls inappropriate bullshit.

        [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

        and you like naming your shit....

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        I expect much rounder discussion of things in s/Tits.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        But if we were doing s/BabyNames, I'd have to call that one Chris Brown, cause it was big, black, and it beat me up on the way out.

        [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

        The LXXXVIII troll was here earlier, so it was probably voted with a bunch of fake accounts (sorry, Musky, it happens).

        [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

        Or people just like tits.

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        IDK, he doesn't usually put much effort into posts he doesn't like.

        [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Ok

        [–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Or that is just what the algorithm thinks of you. 😁