you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

3 Questions:

1) Who were the two?

2) How would you design social media to avoid the pitfalls of addiction, psyops, etc?

3) What do you think of this: /s/mensrights/comments/77b9/apa_div_51_asks_regarding_men_a_question_paul/ ?

[–]369 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

1) Enza and someone else I'm not going to mention.

2) I don't think you're taking the right approach. I think it's best to recognize ways in which our addictions can help us and then find ways to innovate them which satiate but also remedy the pitfalls. Preventative methods seem to not work for some reason, but I can't pinpoint it. I'll relent that I haven't really put that much thought in to this though.
This is sort of an area of interest to me, so I guess what I can say that just might be of some substance is that removing vanity seems to have the most positive effect. We succeeded in this respect with imageboards: users now focus on quality of information and its density and generally shame those that deviate from removing vanity from discourse.
Outside of this, I'm unsure how we would innovate it.

3) If you were going to invade a country, or, hell, even just cripple it because someone there called you ugly, your first steps would be asking wht the best approach is. Well, these days, warfare is quite a bit more refined than in the recent past. With the advent of social media, weakening an opponent is requisite to engaging them.
So, we should ask ourselves, "how might we weaken our opponent via social media?"
Well, I imagine you noticed these things are interlinked on purpose - we're all here, right now, discussing this because we dared to remain competent and disagreeable, among other masculine traits. In their endeavors to weaken us, their gambit was trading our being walled off for our opportunity to coordinate.
Unfortunately for them, we innovated faster than they could stifle us and are pushing back. You'll notice TRP, NoFap, MGTOW and all of their ilk were infiltrated. The Proud Boys get newbies that always try to get them to do blow, the Boogaloos were clearly comped from the beginning and Jordan Peterson is relentlessly mauled for good reason from CNN to 4chin. All of these things overlap and it's all on purpose.

It's rather fitting Paul had a mini statue of Atlas on his desk. As he conveyed, Atlas shrugging will sink Feminists, so they take themselves down. Men need to be competent and not subservient to deluded, lonely Feminists and recognizing their value again is the first step to do it.

Our species got this far on Traditional Values and respecting both genders equally. Feminism is for Gynocentrists and, as Paul more or less points out, isn't at all about promoting, freeing nor celebrating Feminism, but about feminizing men.