you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

You don't know what the word "conspiracy" means. Let's cite the dictionary to help:

noun, plural con·spir·a·cies.

  1. the act of conspiring.

  2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

  3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.

  4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.

  5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.n evil, unlawful, treacherous, or

  6. surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

None of these definitions fit your use of the word "conspiracy", as it appears you actually meant "agreement" or "cooperation" of some kind. Rather, conspiring and conspiracy inherently imply nefarious, evil, unlawful, or other plans or plots against someone or something. In other words, blaming a race of people for such things means you have a theory of a conspiracy to explain some observations. A conspiracy theory.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

This is merely intent. If others think you're doing good then it's not a conspiracy, if they think you're doing bad, it's a conspiracy.

How dumb are you?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

...?? You believe in a conspiracy theory because you ascribe intent to a race of people that you consider in some sense evil toward you. Yes. Exactly my point. Is English not your first language?

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

What are you referring to? Be specific. What "conspiracy theory" do you think I believe that isn't true?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Literally your own article. Even the title. "Jews plan to permanently silence the west". You blame the Jews for a given set of opinions and believe them to be nefarious, and have a theory that they're responsible. Hence, conspiracy theory.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Did you read the article? You can't just say "I won't believe the conclusion" and call that a refutation.

Yes, Jews (not all Jews but primarily Jews) are conspiring to subvert White countries, i.e. by flooding them with non-Whites and destroying their sense of self-preservation. That's just a fact. sorry.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

primarily Jews

[[citation needed]].

by flooding them with non-Whites and destroying their sense of self-preservation. That's just a fact. sorry.

Claiming it's true doesn't make it true. I challenged you to defend your beliefs. You've consistently failed to even make the attempt, and I refuted your conspiracy theory in the first place by pointing out plenty of other people share the ideological beliefs you ascribe to "primarily jews".

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Nope. I am not going to bother. You can either present your strongest arguments here or go away. I've already had these arguments over the past five years, as I said, and I'm not going to keep dumpster diving when all of them amount to what I already said. You invent an exclusivity when the ideas you claim Jews hold are held my far more people than there are Jews to begin with, and advocated for by them besides. It's no more sensible than the satire of it, the "Hibernian conspiracy". https://imgur.com/gallery/opBuw

[–]Fitter_Happier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Do you think if Jews were against mass migration and for preserving Whites' supermajority status in White countries it would be happening, given their influence in Hollywood, publishing, magazines, television, etc.? Do you? Honestly?

Yes, big business wants more people to raise the GDP because they make more money, but that's always been the case but they were kept in check by public opinion, but public opinion has been hijacked by Jews who fear WHITE SUPREEEEEEMACISTS!!!!!, so every fucking time someone suggests curtailing immigration the Jews trot out (((Anne Frank))) and Hitler. But this is so fucking obvious I don't know why I'm wasting my breath.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dumpster dive here:

https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

Here's an excerpt:

We need to rescue it from the influence of those who understand America not in terms of its abstract constitutional principles, not as embodied in the Bill of Rights, but rather in some Buchananite version of blut un boden. It was recently reported in the Tennessean that Buchanan's Reform Party has, unsurprisingly enough, made all-out anti-immigration a central plank of its platform, calling for a 10-year moratorium on all immigration. It must be admitted that this attitude clearly resonates with a majority of Americans. Every time representative samples of Americans are presented this option on opinion surveys of all sorts they support it, though usually it is couched in the context of a five-year moratorium. We are not advocating surrender to the thoughtless mob, but we are advocating the design of policy closer to where the American people actually are with regard to the issue, at the same time that we morally educate them to extend the parameters of their sense of community. Here is a good role for the church.