you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

because they often spend a ridiculous amount of time working on custom CSS, and custom graphics, writing excessively long posts and comments, and making and decorating dozens of random subs

/u/magnora7 literally writes what's going on but can't accept the fact that people get upset when they spend a lot of time trying to contribute to the site (in my case, future-proof it against legal and administrator abuse by posing principal questions) and they're shat on.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I am glad when people help out. I am not glad when people pretend to help so that they can later undermine it more deeply. There's quite a difference. I am only speaking of the latter.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am not glad when people pretend to help so that they can later undermine it more deeply. There's quite a difference.

It's a good thing you can read my mind so you know my actual motives beyond the ones I present myself.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Which is why I give everyone the benefit of the doubt until they break the rules. No mind reading required.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Without specifics and examples I can only kind of agree.

In my case, I was trying to help improve and organize and classify subs - for better reference and research and search results. My ideas for democratic sub developments were ignored.

I was also trying to improve the aesthetics and practicality with my evolving Ergonomix CSS, applied to several subs, which I needed mod access to update - but I was called a sub hoarder (true-ish) and power mod (categorically false).

Talking to [deleted] in any substantial way seems moot and a waste of time. I don't even talk to myself.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

but I was called a sub hoarder

100+ subs only for the admins, not for you.

Talking to [deleted] in any substantial way seems moot and a waste of time.

I'm sorry that you need to know who's saying something before you evaluate the content.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To the wind and no one in particular:

I never had close to 100 subs, nor want them. Nor do I see that as a problem if they're not abused. Who's to say there's a limit until the admin decides and announces there's one. Explosively in this case. Now there's a limit of 40.

I had 40 and didn't even want most of them, but I wanted the topics to exist to post under to help organize SaidIt. I also wanted to be able to update the CSS and banners. Unfortunately chaos reigns and SaidIt is no more organized than the barnyard animals on Reddit.

I tried to be the change I wanted to see in the world and lead by example. I was free to help in the manner that I could until I wasn't.