you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So the paper itself wasn't AI generated, just the images?

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes - the reviewer's explanation in the Vice article is that he wasn't responsible for reviewing the images, which makes me wonder if the article was sent to him initially without images. Still, if the managing editor (or reviewer) could not spot those goofy words in the AI images, it's time to reevaluate the editors and the review process. The article is not AI (per zerohedge), and the "giant penis" is not important, as that's typical of an expanded view in a scientific illustration. zerohedge is cancer.

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are YOU AI generated?