Truth bomb about troons and child transitioning gets posted to reddit. Lets see how fast the user gets banned.

submitted by Scolias from reddit.com

all 25 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SMCAB 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is, that's not an unpopular opinion. It's only an unpopular opinion on that website full of faggotry and mental illness.

[–]Musky 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

Got this gem for saying even the LGB wants to drop the T.

Your post or comment appears to be advocating for LGB to be seperate from the T, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS.

[–]bucetao6969 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's true. They created that rule to specifically ban that subreddit.

[–]NastyWetSmear 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

That's a specific rule?? Look, it's one thing to make a rule like: "No hateful language" and then just ban anything you don't like under the guise of "Hateful", it's another thing to specify which opinions you can't have.

[–]Musky 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah, and I wasn't even advocating for it, just mentioned it was a thing. I haven't checked yet to see if my comment has been restored.

[–]NastyWetSmear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know that it's worth it. Maybe just chill here with us. :) If you say: "Some gay people don't like that trans people are included in their representation", nobody here will lynch you.

They might disagree, but not in a way that removes you from the conversation.

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is my home, I just go out looking for content and to fight the good fight.

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Think of reddit as China government. Even mentioning a resistance exists on China could be problematic. Same thing about LGB dropping the T on reddit. Doesn't matter if you support it or not.

So they're gonna bend that rule to ban you, even if it doesn't apply.

[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://saidit.net/s/MeanwhileOnReddit/comments/b9lx/truth_bomb_about_troons_and_child_transitioning/13foo

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ha! That's very Mask Off. Is it written into their rules on the site?

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From what I understand they banned the sub right after making a new rule. That was alongside the 2000 sub ban, I remember they banned even LGB Conservative which didn't fit into this particular rule but conservative = hate group for the average woketoid.

More on it here: https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/52uk/within_1_hour_reddit_banned_2000_subsalmost_all/

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It must be a hell of a life to scrawl through every sub on Reddit to find ones you don't like, then create rules specifically to ban them, then ban 2,000 of them. Sometimes, in a video game I enjoy, I'll grind by doing the same thing over and over to get more and more rewards... But 2,000 times? Boy...

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most of those subreddits where clones so there was chapo_traphouse2, chapo_traphouse3 etc that's why it got to over 2000

But there were at least a few subs with a lot of users.

[–]Clownfall 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your post or comment appears to be advocating for LGB to be seperate from the T, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS.

Coming next year: 'Your post or comment appears to be advocating for a Republican presidential candidate, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS'

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/r/oddlyspecific

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Looks like nearly 1000 people are about to be banned from reddit

[–]UncleWillard56 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All this talk on the left about "safe spaces" but one of the safest spaces is childhood (obviously barring bad/abusive parents, which I don't count parents who refuse to allow invasive surgery and hormone therapy for their children until they're adults). Loving parents are the best safe space and it allows a child to grow and make mistakes without them costing so dearly. Transitioning children is not affirming in any way.

[–]Evola 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Communism's ideology is a drive to the womb so in that sense you can apply Freuds theories to those people. It's all about talking the easiest path in life and having no responsibility. Women have less responsibility than men therefore it's better to be a women. Children have less responsibilities than adults so it's better to be a child. These people sacrifice life force itself for the sake of convenience. Truly demons given a flesh format that they willing flay of themselves to be driven from the most basic autonomy.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I got a 7 day all reddit ban for making that statement in the title.

(still posts to reddit)

NGMI

[–]lordgaben 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

the truth is there is no right answer.

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not the truth.

That's you fence sitting

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's what these woketoids don't get. They're talking kids not teenagers. If they said something like "teenager can consent to sex so they can consent to puberty blockers" (where I live even a 14 year old can legally consent) they could have gotten more sympathy but they managed to repulse so many people with the whole trans youth thing it's far too late now?

[–]Scolias[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Even teenagers I don't agree with either. Teens do dumb shit, younger me included.

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah but in most places it's understood a 16 year old can consent to sex even if they can't do things like buy a gun. Some have 18 years old I guess.

I'm still on the fence on puberty blockers for 16 year olds. No hard surgeries though.

[–]Clownfall 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was another pretty big truth bomb in r/medicine, with a lot of medical professionals expressing skepticism about the evidence supporting gender-affirming treatment: https://archive.md/T31Qy