Truth bomb about troons and child transitioning gets posted to reddit. Lets see how fast the user gets banned.

submitted by Scolias from reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

Got this gem for saying even the LGB wants to drop the T.

Your post or comment appears to be advocating for LGB to be seperate from the T, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS.

[–]bucetao6969 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's true. They created that rule to specifically ban that subreddit.

[–]NastyWetSmear 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

That's a specific rule?? Look, it's one thing to make a rule like: "No hateful language" and then just ban anything you don't like under the guise of "Hateful", it's another thing to specify which opinions you can't have.

[–]Musky 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah, and I wasn't even advocating for it, just mentioned it was a thing. I haven't checked yet to see if my comment has been restored.

[–]NastyWetSmear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know that it's worth it. Maybe just chill here with us. :) If you say: "Some gay people don't like that trans people are included in their representation", nobody here will lynch you.

They might disagree, but not in a way that removes you from the conversation.

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is my home, I just go out looking for content and to fight the good fight.

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Think of reddit as China government. Even mentioning a resistance exists on China could be problematic. Same thing about LGB dropping the T on reddit. Doesn't matter if you support it or not.

So they're gonna bend that rule to ban you, even if it doesn't apply.

[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://saidit.net/s/MeanwhileOnReddit/comments/b9lx/truth_bomb_about_troons_and_child_transitioning/13foo

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ha! That's very Mask Off. Is it written into their rules on the site?

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From what I understand they banned the sub right after making a new rule. That was alongside the 2000 sub ban, I remember they banned even LGB Conservative which didn't fit into this particular rule but conservative = hate group for the average woketoid.

More on it here: https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/52uk/within_1_hour_reddit_banned_2000_subsalmost_all/

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It must be a hell of a life to scrawl through every sub on Reddit to find ones you don't like, then create rules specifically to ban them, then ban 2,000 of them. Sometimes, in a video game I enjoy, I'll grind by doing the same thing over and over to get more and more rewards... But 2,000 times? Boy...

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most of those subreddits where clones so there was chapo_traphouse2, chapo_traphouse3 etc that's why it got to over 2000

But there were at least a few subs with a lot of users.

[–]Clownfall 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your post or comment appears to be advocating for LGB to be seperate from the T, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS.

Coming next year: 'Your post or comment appears to be advocating for a Republican presidential candidate, which violates Reddit's sitewide TOS'

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/r/oddlyspecific