you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yes, deflect but not deny.

Deny What? So far your question is "So now ESG funds are dark money?". The answer is "If and only if it's from people or organizations whose names are not known or revealed."

Your inability to comprehend simple English is dragging this out. You're trying to avoid something? Were you beaten with a scholarly paper as a child?

So how was that paper funded?

The dinosaur one?

The question you're avoiding answering is "What is the outside influence on this paper?"

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I can't answer that question as with most papers they do not disclose conflicts of interest.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So you have no basis for claiming that the is one?

... But you suspect that the big dinosaur skin is biassing the results by influencing the research by threatening funding unless the interpretation of the fossil meets their nefarious purposes?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

"""Dinosaur skin™..."""

Just stop.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Are you not even following the conversation?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No. I'm not. You've turned it into a joke I'm afraid. Sorry!

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Mate, you've claimed every paper has outside influence biasing it.

You're comments are a joke long before I responded to them.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Go on.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you're proposing the existence of big dinosaur skin biasing palaeontology research, you need to go back on the meds.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I sure do! Gosh you pwned me there with that one!