you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yousaythosethings 36 insightful - 4 fun36 insightful - 3 fun37 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

That’s what I came here to quote. All of the “surprisingly” and “presumably” language should smack everyone in the face as evidence that these idiots revised definitions of sexual orientation are the problem, not people’s dating habits. And how “trans-excluosionary” is a misnomer in many cases because a number of people are willing to date trans people whose biological sex is consistent with their sex-based orientation. Any sane person reading this gets it.

[–]oofreesouloo 33 insightful - 4 fun33 insightful - 3 fun34 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I was also going to comment on that haha! OF course we would rather date a trans man over a trans woman LMAO! What is it about this so ~surprising~? I personally wouldn't date either one, but if I REALLY had to choose, I would choose a trans man, because it IS a female!!!!!! And we are not blind... omg, they're so stupid for real.......

[–]lavender_menace 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

that’s kinda it. They aren’t stupid, they play stupid. They pretend reality is different than it actually is.

[–]mangofruit 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's like they did such a good job of educating people that gender and sex are different things that most people identify their attraction based on sex, not gender. Wow, who could have imagined?