you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MyLongestJourney 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They created a law which can be interpreted extremely broadly so people keep bringing lawsuits trying to bankrupt small business who refuse to "speak" support for gay things

Oh that is going to win us a lot of allies /s

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The supreme court already ruled that the law can't be used to force a wedding cake baker to decorate a cake with gay iconography. In my mind that means the state law should be struck down but it wasn't and that very same baker is being sued again to make a gender transition cake under the same law. The decision this week was AGAIN coming from the same law and trying to assert that a website designer must design websites for gay weddings. I don't know what it takes to just eliminate the law which is causing the cases to keep going up to the supreme court.

[–]SwampOphelia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That law really needs to be struck down. There is a lot of precedent that compelled speech is unconstitutional.