LGB ErasureForced teaming, again: Tumblr post with 30k notes claims, "You have pride because of leather daddies and Trans Women of Color"

submitted by reluctant_commenter from tumblr.com

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As much as I’d like to have sex with leather daddies, I know they didn’t do all the work. In fact, it helps if leather daddies keep their fetishes private and not let their fetishes interfere with the gay rights movement.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Leather daddies were always a tiny gay subculture, like many others.

It's crazy how queer activists love to completely overblow their importance to the gay rights movement.

Like, most normies don't even know leather communities are a thing, much less gay leather communities.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why are they so obsessed with Pride? Pride had little to do with winning gay rights even in the US and especially here in Europe.

You know what helped get us rights? Being normal people that other people could relate to and sympathize with.

Not being perverts shoving weird fetishes in people's faces and forcing them to be part of it. Remember when consent mattered? Because forcing people to be part of your exhibistionist fetish is a violation of consent.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Admitting that the assimilationists they despise so much were the ones responsible for gay acceptance would make their heads explode, and we can't have that!

Instead is better to credit tiny, mostly unknown subcultures to the average person with the achievement!

It totaly makes sense!

[–]MBMayfair 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That post confuses me. I've always seen the word "discourse" used to mean discussion, or hashing something out via discussion. What the hell is meant by "queer discourse needs to die, right now"? When I tried to read more comments in an effort for clarification, I got blocked (a popup required signing up, which ain't gonna happen). Anyone?

[–]reluctant_commenter[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How to deal with that popup: https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/9jjc/sunday_social_open_chat/yt8k

That post confuses me. I've always seen the word "discourse" used to mean discussion, or hashing something out via discussion. What the hell is meant by "queer discourse needs to die, right now"?

They are using that word without regard to the word's actual meaning. TRAs do that with the word "dialogue" too: they say, "We want a dialogue about X," but then that just turns out to be them monologuing at you and getting pissed at you if you don't believe their claims completely and immediately.

[–]MBMayfair 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks, RC. Yeah, that's what I suspected - a case of "that word does not mean what you think it means". Idiots. 🙄

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.