you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"Trans lobby group Stonewall brands lesbians 'sexual racists' for raising concerns about being pressured into having sex with transgender women who still have male genitals"

Fixed it for them. No qualifier needed, good lordy! No one is obliged to sleep with a trans person regardless of how many surgeries they've had.

And it's not at all surprising that Stonewall tried to interfere.

https://archive.ph/x6Ula

[–]pacmanla 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly. I get sick & tired of hearing the "what about post-op" argument/talking point/nonsense. They're still males & it's STILL not a vagina.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Someone used the term "knockoffs" on this sub in the last week. I cringed and laughed at the same time. It's true. If you have an inferior product that you made that way, that is your own damned fault. Especially when you previously had the standard product most people are looking for. (Physically only; it's never a seller's market for shitty personalities.)

[–]reluctant_commenter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fixed it for them. No qualifier needed, good lordy!

Thank you. Many news articles poorly communicate this point.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup, which is infuriating. Any verbiage whatsoever that implies an obligation on the part of members of one group to sleep with members of another group for ANY REASON, EVER is morally repugnant. I'm aghast that this obvious fact doesn't whack them between the eyes from their own awareness before they write such things.