you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Also because of the relentless efforts to change language. The only word that LGB ever attempted to redefine was "marriage", and even then the change didn't impose any cognitive burden. In cases where it did compel speech/action (hint, bake-me-a-cake-bitch) some of us were very opposed to that.

Also, the relentless effort to trans children. LGB made it pretty clear that MAPs weren't welcome.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We didn't even change the definition of "marriage". It was never explicitly defined as heterosexual and the word was used to mean a joining of anything,not just people.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We kind of just wanted to be added, not really change the def.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, yes, but some people perceived it as a change. Regardless, it didn't demand anything of anybody else.