ColonizationThe insufferable... er, suffering... is real

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from archive.vn

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]orangina5 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

asexuality is not a biological thing though. not everything needs a biological thing. everyone is trying to shove their useless, made up garbage into the "born this way" essentialism that we legitimized. if you're an "asexual homosexual" or "asexual heterosexual" then thats not a sexual orientation since it just describes your sexual orientation. and the women you know are absolutely 100% lying to you. they have much infighting and many factions. that's why they call it a "spectrum". There isnt a single true "asexual". theyre "asexual" but have thought about men..that makes them straight. or gay. they then seperate into asexuals who infight and attack because they're nymphomaniacs and cant stop having sex but dont like romance or dating. then there are the ones who have no sexual attraction but love dating and romance and it divides into 900 other categories.

again, we simply dont care. they have nothing to do with us and theyre not a sexual orientation. it's like calling "off" a television channel or bald a type of hairstyle. it's not biological and good for them. there are maybe 90000 different types of descriptors of sexuality similar to asexuality. "demi sexuality" or "sapio sexual" is closer to them than having that precious, precious, precious, precious, precious access to the label "sexual orientation". That category is worth more than gold to them hence why they get so psychotic and homophobic when they end up crashing into a wall of logic that wont let them pass.

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I think you're talking about these asexuals who insist that they still experience so called romantic attraction to the others. But I am considered to be that aromantic asexual in their language. I never think about men or women at all. I'm strongly indifferent to them in a sexual/romantic way. But of course, when I see reactions such as "asexuality doesn't exist and isn't biological" then my mind goes like "Is my indifference then a weird form of bisexuality? But I'm not really that interested in women and men though." and I don't deal with medical issues and I take no meds. I also don't have any trauma.

No idea what I should do about it then. Lie I am a weird bisexual who doesn't wanna bang and date?

[–]orangina5 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

no one admits to or is aware of trauma but you're still either heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual. the asexuality just seems like an intensity lever. it doesnt go beside them as an orientation.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Alright, explain Nikola Tesla then. He was famous for not being interested in anyone period, even though women fawned after him.

[–]usehername 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I know you're not talking to me, but homosexuality was a crime in much of Europe when he was alive, so he could have been gay.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Maybe, but the way that man described his thought processes and his hyperfocus on his work seems to point towards disinterest rather than homosexuality.

Edit: Sorry, he was very open about his celibacy because apparently celibacy helped him focus on his work, from what I can tell?

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah some of the historical "asexuals" were usually celibate or hiding that they were gay really.

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

he was very open about his celibacy because apparently celibacy helped him focus on his work, from what I can tell?

Ah, makes sense.

[–]orangina5 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

lol nichola tesla was gay as were most asexual men and women back then. as were most "bachelors". as were most "roommates". Or are you going by the "well, those two women together who spent 60 years together must have been such amazing roommates that no husband would be worth leaving your best buddy for".

"incel" was a word invented by a lesbian to help teach gays and lesbians to be content living perfectly alone, forever. the overwhelming majority of gays and lesbians were "incels". we were "involountarily celibate" and were taught to learn to be content with living a life of academic pursuit or some life meant for the greater good. and our culture is filled with lies and phantom identities for everything to satisfy the incredibly dangerous and violent curiosity of the heterosexuals. What were we supposed to say in those days? "yes, i am forever alone because im not sexually attracted to women because im _______ <--something i dont even have the word for but it's an attraction to the same sex?" That's quite a very cheap analysis, dont you think? And if public knowledge would have gotten out that he had a sexual attraction to men, he would have been the laughing stock of the world.

All our lives we were taught to worship chopin as some incredible, great composer. He was basically the face of polish genius and culture. Chopin was stupid enough to have sent messages back and forth revealing he was having affairs with men but he was always presented as "asexual" or sexless. Polish historians openly admitted that for the good of the nation and heterosexual supremacy, they hid this fact. Most geniuses that are held up as beacons of hope, genius and creativity of their entire nations and people tend to be gay but made so sexless and so covered up, that theyre presented as "asexuals".

There are countless examples of this in multiple countries. Armenia, one of the most violently psychotic and homophobic countries on the planet who desperately wants to show its enemies its superiority and their barbarism, their culture vs their degeneracy.... defined itself by the symbol of a poet and put him on their money. Now guess what this asexual turned out to be but it was hidden for "the good of the nation".

Why do i have to teach you these things? You're supposed to be a lesbian. So why do i know more about lesbians and their psychology than you? Perhaps you focus too much on their "im a woman" and less about the psychology of homosexuals. Being a sexual being in homophobic countries is rare. And the psychological damage done to these homosexuals in homophobic environments made them disgusted with themselves to the point where they were couldn't even get aroused as homosexuals.

You speak with such a paucity of knowledge on gays and lesbians. You're very welcome for having these conversations with me by the way. It helps elevate you from the incredibly superficial understanding you have of the world, especially of gays and lesbians. and in case you run away crying about the big bad meanie, notice how every single reply you got corrected your ignorance since i know in your head you like to think this is some 50/50 argument between you and me? do better.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm honestly wondering how you have the time to write all of this out.

[–]orangina5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do you just want pity? it takes less than 1 minute to. sadly, i think you spend even more time spewing your ignorance out. At least you're learning. good for you.