you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]slushpilot 28 insightful - 12 fun28 insightful - 11 fun29 insightful - 12 fun -  (5 children)

removed her as a mod after seeing the evidence. (this is not evidence from terfs)

Those parentheses say a lot.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem 27 insightful - 10 fun27 insightful - 9 fun28 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

"This evidence is false because it is posted by TERF, now this very same evidence is posted not by TERF - so it is valid evidence"

[–]JulienMayfair 20 insightful - 8 fun20 insightful - 7 fun21 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

. . . and we got it from TERFs, but we confirmed it independently, so it's no longer terfy.

[–]winterwillow 20 insightful - 8 fun20 insightful - 7 fun21 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

I noticed that too, "terf misinformation" lol.

[–]barnarnasis this tv show my friend? 26 insightful - 9 fun26 insightful - 8 fun27 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

As if terfs would need to run a smear campaign to make TRAs look bad when they manage to do that all on their own

[–]dreamgermsbisexual nightmare 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just like on Tumblr where people will reblog popular posts by gender critical or radical feminists and say “it was by a terf, so I stole it!” or agree with the post but fill the notes with “OP IS A TERF”. I have never seen any other group have people consistently and regularly agree with them or parts of their ideology, but still claim that group is a “hate group” or promotes “hate speech”.