all 22 comments

[–]QueenOfTheNorthSuperLesbian 48 insightful - 1 fun48 insightful - 0 fun49 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't know any other group that goes out of their way to this extent to find things to be upset about.

It all goes to show that their entire ideology is built on a house of cards. Human belief is a powerful tool. Take money as an example. Because we all believe that money can be exchanged for goods and services, money has a lot of value. If society as a whole up and decided that money was worthless it would become worthless - things only have the worth they are ascribed en masse. TRAs seem to be taking this to the logical extreme - if we force absolutely EVERYONE out there to see us as our desired sex, then we become the desired sex! They keep seeking "transphobia" out because sects of people who don't believe the illusion are as dangerous as people who don't believe in the value of money in a newly established economy, or who don't believe some medieval ruler is the rightful king. They must be silenced since their entire existence is only an idea, a belief, a thought. They are the opposite sex in the feeble way in which a king has power, through belief, it is like a shadow. It is not based in material reality and falls apart when people no longer believe or have the language to discuss it.

Trans is something everyone has to pretend in order for it to work, which is one of the fundamental ways in which it is different form homosexuality. Homosexuality doesn't have to be believed in and if the language to describe homosexuals didn't exist, homosexuality wouldn't disappear, while the same being true for transgenderism would make it fizzle out completely.

That's another reason they keep inventing new words, new flags, new genders and new sexualities. It's in an effort to make something that's fundamentally nothing seem more than just a shadow on the wall, to give it legitimacy. They see a reddit sub of biological lesbians as a big threat because actually it IS a big threat. Any disbelief suspends the illusion, even one person allowed to speak out against it is blasphemy. Because the disbelief can spread and suddenly you're just a man in a dress who chemically castrated himself again - suddenly the king is wearing no clothes.

[–]soundsituationI myself was once a gay 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Money is a natural phenomenon and wasn't always controlled by governments, and while it is symbolic, its success or failure isn't exactly determined by majority belief. It's more like, majority trust in a medium of exchange results from that medium possessing a non-arbitrary set of qualities (qualities which have been consistent across time and all manner of civilizations).

End tangent/

[–]QueenOfTheNorthSuperLesbian 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Right, I'm talking more so about paper money. Trade has always existed, but paper money is a relatively new phemomen, and even newer is digital money - there is no gold behind either. It used to be that you could go to a bank and exchange your paper money for some actual gold but over time that evolved to the paper money being just as good as the gold and now there's no gold to back it up, it's held together by belief. Money itself is worthless and not made of anything valuable, it's symbolic, and if we all suddenly stopped believing in its value and digital money there would be issues. But, property and resources and land always have tangible value

[–]soundsituationI myself was once a gay 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Regarding digital money, time will tell how solid the current cryptocurrencies are. But one major thing it has going for it is decentralization, which actually gives it a leg up on gold, or gold-backed paper. Even gold is a symbolic store of value, of course - what I'm saying is that in the case of money the qualities that make it valuable (or not so valuable) aren't arbitrary; societies select for these qualities before agreeing to a common medium of exchange. Just because something is conceptual doesn't make its properties arbitrary; that the Venezuelan Bolivar doesn't equal the US Dollar isn't a matter of mass (dis)belief, but rather one of fundamental differences. We could all suddenly stop believing in a currency but that wouldn't circumvent the need for some kind of currency, as direct trade is impractical outside of tiny communities. So, money is a naturally occurring need, and the properties that make it good or bad are consistent across time and culture.

Gender identity truly is a fugazi though. I think "non-naturally occurring money"--basically everything from WWI to Bitcoin--is analogous with gender identity ideology.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 47 insightful - 2 fun47 insightful - 1 fun48 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't know about anyone else, but I find this seriously concerning. It's a violation of people's privacy, and effectively puts a red target on their back for TRA who are itching to doxx and terrorize people. Someone labeled a "terf" by this stupid extension could be tracked by a rabid transwoman itching to "kill a terf" and literally murdered. They did this before "shinigami eyes". "Dana" Rivers, one of the anti-Mitchfest terrorists murdered a lesbian couple and their son, burning down their home, because they refused to have a threesome with him.

The fact that anyone could side with these people is baffling to me at this point.

[–]dramasexual 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

because they refused to have a threesome with him.

Oh my god is that really why? I've heard of this case but hadn't heard anything about the motive.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I originally read that in the comments of this article:

https://www.gendertrending.com/2019/08/13/media-blackout-on-dana-rivers-michfest-murder-trial/

A person in the comments claims to have insider information on his motive, but idk about proof. It could be wrong. I read in another article that the police claimed it might have been a "property dispute". That doesn't seem likely to me, b/c the murder was so brutal and violent. It seems very personal. I believe the rejection motive over the property motive, but we won't know for sure until that monster is tried.

[–]julesburm1891 46 insightful - 2 fun46 insightful - 1 fun47 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Reason 5793 we want to split from TQ+. We don’t want to be associated with people who are creepy and obsessed enough to make a web extension to track those who disagree with them.

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 38 insightful - 1 fun38 insightful - 0 fun39 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They really don't realize they act like a cult, don't they? These people self-isolate themselves from any opinion which is different from their established dogma. You can't even call it differently than just a dogma.

[–]bopomofodojo 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A member in the throws of a cult never thinks its a cult or that they are a cultist.

[–]homosomes 30 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 0 fun31 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, it was made by a literal pedophile rapist. There's even another "terf" blocker like this one that was also created by a convincted pedophile. Hmmm... I wonder how a person like that could possibly use an extension like this for nefarious purposes?

[–]Seahorse 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is nuts.

These people are so mentally ill it's not funny, extremely unhealthy. History will look badly on them, of course they're too delusional to actually understand this.

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]theytookourjerbsXX only. 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They had one called "Block bot" five years ago as well. I think it was made by a different person. I've heard there's another one last year or so, but forgot what that one was called. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/block-bot.19878/ I wouldn't be surprised if there's loads more of these out there.

[–]FineIWillDoItMyself 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The creator of this extension was arrested for multiple sexual assaults and for Raping another trans person when the later was 14 years old.

[–]DefinitelyNotJannatPussy connoisseur 18 insightful - 4 fun18 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Of course it had to be some sort of anime reference lol

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Weebish cult.

[–]lavender_menace 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Kiwis use it in reverse to find the forbidden/ offensive content. So I guess it’s a two sided sword. Trans use it and trolls use it too. The funny thing about this extension is that some trans people were paranoid about it in the comments, some suspected it was a data miner used to store their data and have lists of all users with their identifiers.

[–]eddyelric 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Beryl[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why am I not even a tiny bit surprised that the creator raped at least one underage girl?

[–]Socialjustus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This extension highlights known subreddits, facebook pages and groups with different colors based on whether they're transphobic or t-friendly.

Love how this completely neglects to say who's making that decision.

[–]ChodeSandwichtender and moist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Naming your stalker's archive after a vaguely threatening ability to measure people's lifespans would be a buttery smooth example of using plausible deniability to legally intimidate people if it wasn't from a fucking cartoon.