Reasons 1 and 3 are still related. Just because a dysphoric man's motivation can sometimes be different from an AGP's doesn't mean there's no overlap. There is quite a bit of overlap. I'm familiar with Blanchard's studies. AGPs experience arousal from performing activities they view as feminine, like knitting. Which spills over into their desire to be subjected to feminine gender roles and stereotypes.

practical and psychological benefits of being seen as non-threatening to the social and psychological benefits of having a highly empathetic friend group.

Being non-threatening and empathetic are not synonymous with feminine gender roles or being seen as a woman. This is entirely subjective. For example, many men see a woman's 'no' as a threat in any context, a challenge they must overcome either by force or coercion. To some people anytime a woman doesn't do what she's told it's seen as threatening.

Empathy is not a feminine thing and plenty of women don't possess an ounce of it. Anyone on r/raisedbynarcissists who had a narcissist for a mother will say as much.

Plenty of trans people (though obviously far from all) take a rather liberal or libertarian (as opposed to hard-left) position on trans issues, in that they're not attempting to coerce people into conforming to their identity.

I wouldn't say 'plenty' but I do agree they exist. Miranda Yardley and Fionne Orlander come to mind. However the presence of people like Miranda and Fionne who object to the madness doesn't suddenly erase the existence of the TRAs who continue pushing it. There are plenty of men who transition primarily out of fetish reasons and to pressure lesbians into sex. There are also plenty of men who transition as a power play to rewrite the definition of womanhood as a silencing tactic so they can freely be violent and throw slurs at anyone who disagrees (i.e all the 'punch/kill/choke TERFS') while getting support for it.

Mr. Philosophy Tube might not be that kind of transwoman. I never heard of him until he decided he was trans and I started seeing posts about it yesterday. But the fact of the matter remains that the violent types of transwomen do exist. And, by implying that his gender nonconformity makes him a woman, Mr. Philosophy Tube is feeding the idea that womanhood is a costume rather than a material reality. Which is part of a broader societal power play by itself that is dead set on not only silencing women, but also eradicating LGBs by transing the gay away, placing intersex people into a third sex category, and making already restrictive gender roles even more suffocating.

Going back to this:

I don't see transwomen as necessarily intending to harm women.

1. No, not all. But there are plenty transwomen who do seek to harm women. 2. The ones who don't intend to do so are still contributing to it indirectly for the reasons I explained.

Your initial comment came across as very out of touch, considering this sub. Posts go up daily about trans people behaving in harmful ways, and a lot of it is intentional. I've heard comments very similar to yours from well meaning people who haven't read up on TRA logic and don't understand the implications of trans activism on single sex spaces, bodily autonomy, women's rights, and LGB rights. So to me, a genuine disagreement would have had more explanations as to why you don't think those three reasons would strip women of our power to varying degrees and in varying circumstances. You listed reasons men transition that many people here are already aware of, said you disagreed with the power play argument, but didn't bother to elaborate on why. You still haven't, really. You just defined AGP (which, again, most people here are well aware of) and linked the wiki page to it, then essentially said 'some trans people disagree with crazy TRAs'. No argument there, but those crazy TRAs are still out there. And even dysphoric, non AGP, non lesbian obsessed transwomen still perpetuate a mindset that is harmful to women overall (like Blaire White for example).