you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RiverSong 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I remember back on r/gendercritical there was a case discussed of a women, uhm ... I mean a trans MAN, who was camping outside of a clinic in London in protest. She was there for some kind of gender surgery, and they removed her vagina (= vaginal channel, I guess). But, surprise, for some reason she wanted to be a man, but still wanted to keep her vagina. Not making fun of someone who received a surgery that they not actually requested ... but I find it absurd to claim to be a MAN, but still desire PIV-sex, and the possibility of pregnancy. Not that manly after all, huh??

[–]worried19 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'll never understand this. If you like your genitals and want to have sex with your natal genitals, what makes you the opposite sex? A lot of trans men even say they want to have kids. You can't get more biologically female than that.

[–]blackrainbow 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's simple, you change reality! Now men can be pregnant too

[–]Eurowoman24 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

agreed. how can you claim to be a gay man or even a straight man and want to still have a vag for either sex scenario, I mean wouldn't you want to be as close to a man as possible ? oh the logical inconsistencies