"Pomosexuality, WTF"

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-08T14:25:10+00:00

I wanted to say I feel bad you had to deal with someone like VigorousTaintMassage, but your comebacks were really good. You're smart (☆>⊇<)

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T21:51:09+00:00

Just because you're a "gay dude" does not mean you know more than those of us who are not "gay dudes". The people above you were correcting you, and telling you you were unnecessarily aggressive. Instead of considering their points, you arrogantly used your "I'm a gay dude" card as a way to show you don't need to learn, because you believe to have figured it all out as a "gay dude". You haven't figured it all out. You are a "gay dude", not all "gay dudes" combined. So please, don't act like you are the voice of all gay men either, you are not.

If you don't want women to make themselves the protector and voice for gay men, then take a few steps back and realize you are not the voice of other gay men either.

There have been gay men who actually appreciated us women's concern for their safety when "trans men"/straight women talk about wanting to do something to them, such as wanting to sleep with them or "experiment" with them. And they thanked me for being concerned, pretty sure many gay men would disagree with you on the things you have said so far.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T21:43:24+00:00

You say you are not a feminist but claim women can not rape men because "men are huge and can defend themselves duh" just like feminists do.

Do you understand women can use drugs to rape a man? Especially gay teens, they are helpless, and an adult woman is capable of sexually assaulting and raping a teenage gay boy. Women are not weak, sweet and helpless beings that can never commit rape on a man ever like you think

Yes, it may not occur as often as men raping women occurs, but it still does occur. And to ignore it is dishonest.

Edit: You have an issue with feminism because of the misandry that exists within feminism, and I agree with that, but all of a sudden you have no issue with women saying they want to "explore" their attraction to gay men and sleep with gay men ...

There's a hypocrisy right there that I want you to notice. Please keep in mind I am against misandry and man-hating of any form. I just want to show you where you are contradicting yourself.

If you have no issue with women who say they want to sexually assault gay men because most of them are socially awkward and can never do anything to gay men, then you should have no issue with feminism and feminists because most of these women who are feminists are socially awkward and would never act on their "k**l all men" or other things they say

Just change whatever was in your comment to this:

Most feminists are the kind of women who are typically awkward, young, and struggle socially in the real world.

Eventhough they constantly talk about "k**ling all men" and "getting rid of all men", they would not be able to approach any man with predatory behavior, not to mention, how would they attack men ... out in the public? I really don't see that going well, because there's a ton of witnesses, and everyone would know these women would be attacking men.

And, again, it wouldn't be easy for a young woman to attack a man.

According to your own words, misandry would have to be no issue.

Again, I am a woman and I still see misandry as an issue. Women should not joke about "k**ling all men" just as women should leave gay men alone and not say they want to sexually harass them, "explore" with them, etc.

I am just reminding you of your own hypocrisy.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T21:34:36+00:00

I never said you are a feminist? Simply that you act and talk like them. The only anti-porn people I have seen were feminists. And they make the exact same "arguments" you do. Word for word.

That one can be raped and "abused" in the porn industry is not a criticism of porn itself. It is a call for the change of the porn industry, there is no issue with a porn where the men and women are not raped and instead are "exhausting" themselves for hours like everyone does in every job ever because they wish to.

They will have to increase the porn actors' and actresses' salaries, and make sure for them not to be raped and "abused" in the industry. That's the solution, not the banning of porn itself.

That they are recorded is also not an issue when they wish to be recorded. It's like acting. An actor or actress is recorded and their faces are for years to come plastered on books, cds, etc, and people watch them in the movies and films they acted in even when they are long retired.

As long as someone wishes to be in the porn industry, and recorded, then the recording is not an issue.

My argument simply was your "ban all porn and don't watch them because one can be raped and abused in porn" makes no sense just as "ban all guns and don't use guns because one can use guns to hurt others" makes no sense.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T21:14:20+00:00

Ah, people have their own opinions on these things for sure! Feminists are anti-porn just like you are (you may be a man but men can talk and act like feminists even if according to feminists feminism is something only women can believe in), while I'm not anti-porn. Every job, porn included, is vile to be fair. I learned that fact from anarchists. So unless one is against all jobs because there is a risk of someone being "abused" by their boss and other employees in a company, then highlighting porn industry and acting like sex work is some exception among all other forms of work does not sound logical and is too hypocritical for me to even consider it an "argument".

It's more like anti-porn people are anti-sex, and do not want people to have sex as work, and do not see other forms of work where people are wasting their body and time on as an issue. Eventhough they are all forms of work, and if someone wants to have sex as work instead of spending hours doing paper work, etc, then I see no issue. I believe it is not up to anyone to decide what other people can do for work.

Saying "men and women get abused in porn industry so do not watch porn!" is just like saying "all guns and knives are bad and the usage of such tools should be banned because someone somewhere can abuse these tools and hurt someone else"

I'm not against guns as I'm not against porn.

You have your own opinion! While I hope you understand others have their own opinions. Thank you for reading!

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T14:43:52+00:00

I know right? The "explore" part sounds so creepy because it gives me the feeling these women want to force themselves on gay men so they sleep with them. I heard women talk about how good it feels to "turn gay men straight" for them, these women should be sent to jail if they ever get close to gay men to "explore" because that would be them literally raping these gay men. Women should leave gay men alone, just as men should leave lesbians alone.

I hope gay men know not all of us women are like that. I'm a lesbian and enjoy watching and reading gay porn, but don't get off on or masturbate to it, I just enjoy gay porn in a non-sexual way. It really looks nice to the eyes. I've never gotten close to a gay man or bothered him at all in reality. Some of us are sane ＼\٩( 'ω' )و //／

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-07T14:28:48+00:00

and a lesbian who writes gay male porn

It's so messed up that these gender identity believers create labels after labels most of which make no sense whatsoever. I am a lesbian who enjoys watching and reading gay male porn. I don't masturbate to or get off on it of course, I just enjoy watching and reading gay male porn as much as I do taking a good bath every morning. Both feel nice, but I don't mean sexually. I would never ever accept being labelled as a pomosexual, and refuse such labels for my daily activities. What, are they going to call me internetsexual for spending many hours online surfing the web too? Just because I enjoy the internet? They are ridiculous ╥﹏╥

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-06T13:22:42+00:00

You're really funny and I mean this, you made me laugh when I got to "shit I forgot to respond to someone" and "I know, super inspiring"!! (≧∀≦)

First it was just existence itself that was an issue, it was/is hard for me to deal with but when I saw the number of people supporting trans people and their gender identity ideology increase I started feeling worse. So many gay men and gay women have gotten hurt because of them. Everyday I lost more hope, until now I believe it will get worse, one day no sane human would be left and everyone would be brainwashed ༼☯﹏☯༽ At least we got each other and this place for now. I hope what I think will happen doesn't actually happen though.

I completely feel you. I know it’s been a rough ride. But that you have made it this far is really something brave! Amidst all the bad things that happen in existence, you are continuously making it through. You are getting stronger and stronger each day! You have to give yourself credit for that. We are fighting the same battle so don't worry, we can help each other get through it even more easily. I wish I could give you and everyone here a real hug but because I can't a virtual hug is the least I can do hugs you ⊂(´・ω・｀⊂)

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-05T14:57:54+00:00

Sorry for the late reply, I fell asleep, and just got back online ಥ_ಥ (◕︿◕✿)

I'm still so thankful you share these in your list with me and others. These are very important, especially when we need to show them to those who know nothing of the homophobia that is so inherent to the gender identity ideology. That can open their eyes!

And you're so kind to ask me how I'm doing, I'm better today than I was a few days ago. Most days I'm too numb to get up from the bed every morning, and the few things that make me happy just don't do the job sometimes. But I'm still trying here and fighting to make myself feel better (ง •̀ω•́)ง✧

What about you? How are you doing?

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-05T02:19:46+00:00

I just saw it!!! Thank you so much! I'm saving the photos up, the list you have is huge and is exactly what we need when people ask "so what did the trans people say to gay people that is so homophobic"

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-05T01:27:38+00:00

100% agree with you! The people that believe in gender identity are homophobic, all of them. They are separated into two groups of: 1) women and men who force gay people to consider sleeping or dating the opposite sex, the method they use: brainwashing gay people to believe "men can have vaginas too" or "women can have penises too". And 2) gay/bi people who hate being gay/bi and believe in gender identity to erase their existence as gay and act like they are straight (e.g. Blaire White, the reason he thinks he is a woman in a straight relationship is because he has internalized homophobia and hates being gay. And just a bit ago I heard the lesbian Ellen Page thinks she is a man, I bet on this it's because she has internalized homophobia and wants to erase her existence as a gay woman).

Why don't gender identity believers ever target straight people? Because it's on their agenda to convert gay people and gay people only. And that got me to oppose those who believe in gender identity immediately

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-04T23:25:02+00:00

I know you know all the answers to those questions! But I'm going to answer them for anyone who doesn't know, because those are good questions! The answer is people who believe in gender identity separate genitals from sex (many of them even think sex is a social construct) and think a man can have a vagina or a woman can have a penis. Obviously that's impossible and is a false belief. But the point is the women who believe they are men go from this basic false belief: that a man can have a vagina and a woman can have a penis. Since they think they are men, and they are attracted to men, they think they are gay men and should date gay men now, because gay men are men only attracted to men.

And when gay men reject these women, they call them "transphobe" because they think: "a man can have a vagina! why don't these gay men accept men with vaginas, we are still men".

The gender identity belief is really messy, and sinister.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-12-04T21:57:04+00:00

I want to compile more screenshots too! Let's get some from twitter next. I'll start in a bit. When I find something I'll dm you (≧∀≦)

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-04T00:36:21+00:00

Thank you for letting me know, I realize the word "breastfeeding" was the wrong choice of words there, since it's not proven whether the thing that comes out of the men that lactate is and can ever be actually similar to the milk that comes out of a female that lactates.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-03T15:22:32+00:00

Breasts are not relevant for social interactions, do you go around looking at people's breasts and inspecting them? I hope not. You subjectively value social interactions, while I, an absolute lazy introvert, do not value social interactions (though many introverts may be different from me), so I don't care about what is or is not relevant for social interactions. The issue with focusing on secondary sexual characteristics instead of genitals is that you're excluding "cis" females with less breast tissue. You literally said "cis" females with smaller breasts are less female. You're excluding literal "cis" females with less breast tissue just so you can include literal males who think they are female when they are not inside the category of female. Also duh, "trans females" are males and males can breastfeed, they can lactate, though it does not happen under usual circumstances, it does happen when males are anxious and they play around with their hormones. Hello middle school biology? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_lactation#:~:text=Human%20male%20breastfeeding%20is%20possible,be%20used%20to%20increase%20lactation.

Human male breastfeeding is possible, but production of the hormone prolactin is necessary to induce lactation, so male lactation does not occur under normal conditions. Domperidone is a drug that can be used to increase lactation.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-males-can-lactate/

He also notes that starvation—which inhibits the functioning of hormone-producing glands as well as the hormone-absorbing liver—can cause spontaneous lactation, as observed in survivors of Nazi concentration camps and Japanese POW camps in World War II. "The glands recover much faster than the liver when normal nutrition is resumed," he writes, "so hormone levels soar unchecked."

Males of many different mammalian species have the potential to lactate, although only one, the Dayak fruit bat of Southeast Asia, does so spontaneously

Males can lactate under such circumstances as long as their breast tissues are actual breast tissues, they can barely do such a thing when they get surgeries and put silicone or other material in there that makes things vastly different from actual breasts.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-03T11:33:36+00:00

So you say sex is determined by secondary sex characteristics ... such as pubic hair, enlarged breasts, facial hair, Adam's apples, etc, but then have an issue with us saying sex is determined by primary sex characteristics such as genitals? You think "a woman with small boobs is less of a woman than a woman with big boobs" meaning a woman with literally all genitals intact but smaller boobs is less of a woman than a man who got surgeries to have bigger "boobs" (we can't even call them boobs because they are not of the same material) than her. You think exceptions to your "woman = big breasts, man = small breasts" are fine, you cover those exceptions by saying "it's okay, a woman with smaller breasts is less of a woman" but so-called "exceptions" to "woman = female genitals and egg, man = male genitals and sperm" are all of a sudden an issue. The irony. It's hilarious. Tell you what. We're going to cover it up the same way, a woman that doesn't produce eggs and is infertile is less of a woman than a woman that can make eggs and is not infertile, cool? Cool. Your "exceptions" don't work and our definitions are not "excluding" anyone (they never were excluding them anyway, you were just straw-manning)

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-03T11:14:13+00:00

Ah yes, pro-trans pseudo-scientific agenda that "scientists" who are afraid of being fired from their jobs and losing money are ready to jump off the hills for says that "sex is bimodal so a woman with small boobs is less of a woman than a woman with very big boobs", nice to see you TRAs hypocritically shutting down people for saying "offensive" things while actually saying such offensive things yourselves.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-03T10:46:26+00:00

As I said earlier, define man and woman for me, give me your definitions of man and woman that do not exclude infertile humans and intersex humans that do not, and I repeat, do NOT, rely on stereotypes and misogyny such as "this man is wearing wigs/dresses/high heels/etc and so he's a woman" (implying that all women wear are such things eventhough clearly that's not true, your definition would be excluding women who simply do not ever wear and/or hate wearing dresses/wigs/high heels/make up such as myself) and nonsensical "gender identity". You're going to say "anyone identifying as a man is a man" or "anyone identifying as a woman is a woman", so let's say I identify as YOU. I am you now and I want full access to your house, credit card, etc. If you do not accept the belief that someone identifying as you is you, then we shall not accept your belief that someone identifying as a man or a woman makes them a man or a woman.

Note: If you ever say "there is no such a thing as a man or a woman" then that means there is no such a thing as a "trans woman" or a "trans man" because they would be "transitioning to something that doesn't even exist", you would be debunking your own pro-trans agenda.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-03T10:39:23+00:00

Huh, alright TRA, define man and woman for me, give me your definitions of man and woman that do not exclude infertile humans and intersex humans that do not, and I repeat, do NOT, rely on stereotypes and misogyny such as "this man is wearing wigs/dresses/high heels/etc and so he's a woman" (implying that all women wear are such things eventhough clearly that's not true, your definition would be excluding women who simply do not ever wear and/or hate wearing dresses/wigs/high heels/make up such as myself) and nonsensical "gender identity". You're going to say "anyone identifying as a man is a man" or "anyone identifying as a woman is a woman", so let's say I identify as YOU. I am you now and I want full access to your house, credit card, etc. If you do not accept the belief that someone identifying as you is you, then we shall not accept your belief that someone identifying as a man or a woman makes them a man or a woman.

Note: If you ever say "there is no such a thing as a man or a woman" then that means there is no such a thing as a "trans woman" or a "trans man" because they would be "transitioning to something that doesn't even exist", you would be debunking your own pro-trans agenda.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-01T23:09:21+00:00

His beliefs could very well be based on "empathy" but this is why I believe empathy is being weaponized and is a dangerous tool in the hands of the people that believe in the transgender beliefs. These homophobes say "I am just trying to help you! If you say you're gay, and if you say you are a man who likes men, they will discriminate against you! They will make you go through a ton of pain! So, how about you learn and start believing you're a woman on the inside?". Just as a racist could tell black people in racist environments "I am just helping you and being empathetic! By turning your dark skin into a lighter color using creams, etc, you will get less discriminated against by racist people!".

The question is, is it okay to change people like this if it means the likelihood of them being discriminated against goes down after the change? Is it okay to tell gay boys and gay men they are women on the inside that's why they like men and that they should get hormones and surgeries and declare they are trans women?

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-01T22:56:50+00:00

Rod Fleming would be considered a trans rights activists, he believes trans women are women and trans men are men, that's the basic belief that all trans rights activists hold. He defines woman as "a person of feminine gender", he says Adiane4u on Instagram, who's a trans woman and whose photo he posted as well, is a woman because he has a feminine gender; https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugyuj-98r1Ln-r9SJTt4AaABCQ

Most of his videos are about ladyboys and gender if you check his channel out, in one video in particular he claims gender critics and people who criticize the trans people are "the nastiest people on the planet" and that trans women are "no threat to cis women"; https://youtu.be/OtR7H3x5DxM

He thinks JK Rowling is "ignorant" for making "extremely transphobic statements"; https://youtu.be/hOHHNw8cuUA

And he thinks it's better for gay men to think they are women on the inside hence why he said to the gay man who "transitioned socially to a woman" that "the whole 'gay is better' claptrap is just a way of supplying the NGM meat market and it needs to stop. Good luck with your transition, I hope your path becomes easier"; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtR7H3x5DxM&lc=UgztyOKB1JRfV6O4ijt4AaABAg.9B4PmfP-ew79B4SmX2a1Hd

Even if after all these, Fleming is not a "trans rights activist", it means he believes in the things trans rights activists believe in and is a believer of transgender beliefs.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-10-01T22:16:33+00:00

Thank you for your explanation! So Rod Fleming is suggesting that "gay men are persuading young potential trans identified males to be happily gay instead of exploring their glorious transhood", I am very disgusted hearing this. I believe Fleming and his views (wanting gay men to think they are women on the inside and be trans identified males instead of accepting themselves as men who like men) are extremely homophobic. What do you think?

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-25T19:30:25+00:00

Of course studies can be fabricated, especially when science is mixed with politics. But eh, if you don't get it, it's not my problem.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-24T16:22:19+00:00

There's no actual empirical research there, it's just you and those people taking some random data out of nowhere to push your agenda that 'gay men have lady brains'. Lies, damned lies, and statistics. And also, I don't care about empirical research when it comes in conflict with gay rights. The natural conclusion of their so-called research is 'oh so a gay man is mentally and psychologically a woman, makes sense now' even if they didn't say it directly, they implied it.

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-24T13:18:48+00:00

Because it just does, it's not a fact that there are areas of the brain that are more similar to the areas of the brain in the opposite sex. It's a hypothesis, and hypothesises can be false and debunked. Even if you're not talking about the entire brain, you're saying a part of the brain of gay people is similar to a part of the brain of their opposite sex. That's how people have come to the conclusion that gay people are psychologically and mentally their opposite sex. And that's ridiculous. You and your "areas of the brains of gay people are similar to areas of the brains of their opposite sex" are not helping gay people, you're pushing things back, making people believe "oh so a gay man is just a woman on the inside? makes sense now"

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-22T21:56:32+00:00

If someone fantasizes about being raped, or if a survivor of rape watches or reads rape porn in animation, drawings, and literature, is it good for this someone to do that? Or should this someone stop because that doesn't help at all and is not really an outlet?

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-21T12:13:00+00:00

Person who believes they are all knowing and know everything, please give me evidence for your claim that the brains of gay men and gay women don't have much of a difference

The tricky brains belong to homosexuals, who are intermediate to both sexes. There's not much difference between a gay man and gay woman.

https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/6g5i/are_the_tqs_right_or_wrong_in_saying_that_the/ozjx

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-21T09:53:27+00:00

If there is no male brain or female brain, then the statement that "the gay brains are structured like the brains of their opposite sex" is false, because there is no typical brain of a female or a typical brain of a male for the brain of a male to be compared to the brain of a female or vice versa

EverydayIsSad · 2020-09-21T00:55:41+00:00

Doesn't mean I'm a man, but I got the typical male sexuality

It would mean you got a male brain and you're psychologically a man though (because you think or act like a typical male) ... If that's true then you would be a "male brain in a female body"

EverydayIsSad