you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]motss-pb[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Evidence:

"Persistence was strongly correlated with the commencement of physical interventions such as the hypothalamic blocker (t=.395, p=.007) and no patient within the sample desisted after having started on the hypothalamic blocker. 90.3% of young people who did not commence the blocker desisted." Source, WPATH 24th Scientific Symposium (June 19, 2016)

While I understand the point you are trying to make (gay kids should have their penises cut off), I disagree with your use of hyperboyle and the leap of logic required to get from "evidence based best practices for dealing with gender dysphoria" to "forced sterilization and elimination of homosexuals".

It's hyperbole, but it's happening in Iran. It's a leap of logic, yet I've cited papers where sexologists have admitted that eugenics and a desire to treat homosexuality motivated their pioneering of the sex-change operation. "Evidence-based best practice" really doesn't mean much when it's coming from a profession that has a long history of abusing LGB people.

Something tells me you're not here in good faith. You didn't migrate here from r/LGBDroptheT did you?

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So putting everyone on puberty blockers means that 90.3% of kids who would not transition otherwise - transition. WPATH is transgender rights organisation, so even if their data is biased - it is biased to the transgender side, not other way around.