This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

How the fuck is a man wearing a dress "appropriation" of trans culture when that's the definition of trans?

Well, yeah, that's the objective definition; what's going on in reality. But of course that's not the TRANS definition. Quite the reverse. Because in order for their genderist ideology to work... there can't be ANY SUCH THING. "Dress = woman" is required. Otherwise, how can a man signal that he's "really" a woman? And not just... a man in a dress? He can't. So dresses must remain off-limits for men IN GENERAL. At least those without LadyfeelzTM.

Ironic that in donning a dress, Mr. Styles is thereby demonstrating that the Trans-Emperor has no clothes.

[–]fuck_reddit 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. That's it at its core. They're terrified the rest of society will realize "hey, Styles likes to wear dresses but he still says he's a man." I personally am not into men in dresses, but I'd take that any day over "wearing a dress makes you trans."